[Gophack]

Wow. I read the whole article (I RARELY do that for the L.A. Times.) The author is no conservative, in fact doesn't have a kind word about Bill Simon. But he just GOES AFTER Davis, as well he should. I hope that this fundraising stuff isn't coming out too early, because I think this could be his fall. For those of us up here in Sacramento, we have always know that Davis was for sale. Let's hope by November 5, everyone else in the state knows it too -- and votes for Bill Simon.

[stands2reason]

It's funny, though...remember, right after the primaries, we were worried that Davis would immediately "define" Simon in the media? Well, it seems more and more, Davis has been "defining" himself. Will these papers endorse Davis? Or will they actually take a historical stand and endorse noone? (Notice I don't consider the impossible a "historic stand"---endorsing Simon would be way beyond "historical"...something less believable than aliens from outer space landing on the White House lawn.)

[BibChr]

The author is no conservative, in fact doesn't have a kind word about Bill Simon

That's what's worrying me, though. I see a lot of negative stuff on Davis... but will Simon start campaigning soon? He's invisible.

People won't just not-vote for Davis. They need to vote FOR Simon. I will be happier when I start reading more about what SIMON is doing and saying.

Dan