A week to go, and no budget (CA)

Sacramento Bee ^ | John6/25/02 Hill

[randita]

Davis seeks elusive GOP votes while corralling his own party.

With the start of the state's fiscal year a week away, Democratic lawmakers said Monday that they will seek passage of budget bills this week that tie tax increases, including one on the wealthiest taxpayers, to preserving an array of programs.

[randita]

In yet another budget development Monday, the state Controller's Office said it would continue to pay state employees their full salaries even if no budget is signed by Monday.

Well, looks like Gray-Out will still get his weekly check even if the budget isn't passed in time.

[randita]

more on the budget

[kellynla]

Well if the budget contains 4.8 billion in program increases and 4.8 billion in tax increases why not eliminate the program increases and forget about the tax increases...now can we all just get along...hmmmmmmmmmm

[socal_parrot]

Let's see, what was that Davis ad about Simon not being able to run a state?

[daviddennis]

Hate to butt in here ... but this is a lousy article, pure and simple. (No, Randita, I'm not criticising you for posting it - I'm ripping into the fellow who wrote it).

What's the total budget? How severe are the cuts? How significant are the tax increases? You wouldn't know from this article, so I'm about to tell you.

The total budget is about $80 billion, so a 4.8billion hit is about a 5% across the board cut. If I were governor, I would make the cut. If your income went down by 5.5-odd percent, I'm sure you would grumble and pull through somehow. No big deal.

This article is talking as though these cuts would be the end of the world, and yet for some reason what would be cut is never explained. Local programs? What local programs? What percentage of local budgets is this?

How can we make a meaningful judgement on the budget crisis without knowing what the proportions are? The article strikes me as a special plea to raise taxes, but it doesn't give us alternatives. I find that shameful and almost certainly biased.

D

[Ernest_at_the_Beach]

What a mess!

calgov2002:

calgov2002: for old calgov2002 articles. 

calgov2002: for new calgov2002 articles. 

Other Bump Lists at: Free Republic Bump List Register

[Libertarianize the GOP]

bttt

[dalereed]

Think of all the savings when the state workers all get reduced to minimum wage (still being highly overpaid for the most part) and the millions of mad democraps (state workers) that will now be convinced that they won't vote for Davis no matter what transpires.

[Drango]

Davis said at a press conference Monday that it was the GOP's "patriotic duty to ensure that we meet the Prop. 98 guarantee."

Davis you Clymer, it's YOUR patriotic duty to resign.

[tubebender]

HeHeHe...I would love to see prop 98 overridden and watch the teachers union scream. This prop was a scam to insure that they get the biggest chunk of the budget no mater how high tax revenues were and the peons of Calif fell for it.

[Ernest_at_the_Beach]

I really like the toon in the register !

[Ernest_at_the_Beach]

that they won't vote for Davis no matter what

Now that would be nice!

[heleny]

An appellate court ruled last month that the state could continue to pay workers absent a budget, but only at the federal minimum wage. But since the case is going to the state Supreme Court, the decision is not final and the paychecks can go out as usual, said Rick Chivaro, chief counsel for Controller Kathleen Connell.

If the California Supreme Court declines to hear the case or agrees with the appellate court decision, do we (the state) get a refund from the state employees who would then have been overpaid from July 1st until a budget is signed?