Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: John Jorsett
What Califorinia does with auto emissions directly costs everyone in the US -- the manufacturers don't like making a CA-only model, consequently this decision impacts every US car buyer.

If enforced, what it means is smaller cars with less power -- there is no other way to reduce CO while using gasoline.

3 posted on 07/02/2002 5:50:30 AM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: bvw
"there is no other way to reduce CO while using gasoline. "

I didn't think there was any way to reduce it. Isn't CO2 a direct result of combustion?

If so, how can it be reduced, short of lessening the combustion, which implies, as you suggest, smaller motors, i.e. smaller explosions in smaller combustion chambers.

Pretty harsh measure, since it appears that mankind's effect on global warming is minimal, anyway.

Perhaps the automakers can comply w/ this by marketing only their smallest cars in CA. Am I right that most of the problems with pollution are centered in LA, with its frequent temperature inversions?

7 posted on 07/02/2002 6:07:56 AM PDT by Sam Cree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson