1 posted on
07/23/2002 10:40:12 PM PDT by
ledzep75
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
fyi
To: ledzep75
Sorry Larry Elison.
4 posted on
07/23/2002 11:07:51 PM PDT by
spetznaz
To: ledzep75
Does this mean that Gay Davis will have to give them back all that money?
To: ledzep75
a state audit report released in April estimated the contract would cost California $41 million--rather than save the state $100 million over six to 10 years, as Oracle contended.
boy, sounds like Enron-accounting ... where a "loss" magically becomes a "profit" ... nah, you're not LOSING money, you're SAVING money ... yeah, that's the ticket ... it only LOOKS like it costs more ...
6 posted on
07/24/2002 12:33:17 AM PDT by
Bobby777
To: ledzep75
the contract would cost California $41 million--rather than save the state $100 million
Oracle... stands by its claims that the contract was a good deal for the state. A "good deal" for the state?!
It was a good deal for Logicon, the Reseller of Oracle, their cut was to be 28 millllliiiioooon dollars (in the best Dr Evil voice)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson