Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why the Pessimism on Front-runner Bill Simon?
NewsMax.com ^ | August 10, 2002 | Carl Limbacher

Posted on 08/10/2002 12:08:44 PM PDT by Carl/NewsMax

You may have noticed that there's something missing from the recent spate of reports predicting that California Republican Bill Simon doesn't stand a chance against incumbent Democrat Governor Gray Davis.

That something would be any actual polling data to support the conclusion.

In fact, though one media wag after another has stepped forward in recent days to pronounce Simon a political dead duck, the California conservative actually leads his left-wing opponent in the only survey released within the last two weeks.

That's right. Though the California press has buried the news so thoroughly that most of the state's voters are unaware of it, a Survey USA poll commissioned by several California network TV affiliates has Simon leading Davis 46 percent to 45 percent.

Not bad for a guy whose campaign is supposed to be toast.

Still, the good news didn't do much to quell critics, who inexplicably maintain that Simon doesn't have a prayer. Here's how the San Francisco Chronicle's Debra Saunders reacted after the Republican's lead was reported in the Washington Times.

"Bill Simon should just give up. He's a lousy candidate. He should admit it, bow out of the race, then endorse a good Republican - Secretary of State Bill Jones - who has a shot at beating the otherwise-vulnerable Gray Davis."

Surely, with all the pessimism on Simon's chances, there must be other polls showing Davis trouncing him.

Well, try as we might, we can't find any.

And apparently, neither could the Simon-doom-and-gloomers at the New York Times, who admitted on Saturday that an earlier survey by California's best-known polling operation, Mervyn Field, showed the GOP candidate chopping Davis' lead in half within the last four months.

And that's not all.

In June, a survey by the Public Policy Institute showed Davis with a sky-high negative job approval ratings of 52 percent. Only 39 percent, noted the Times, approved of Davis' performance in office.

(Buried in a July 28 Los Angeles Times report on the California governor's poll numbers, the paper noted that only 30 percent gave him a favorable job approval rating, putting Davis in the same polling territory as Richard Nixon just before he was forced to resign over Watergate.)

So, how did the New York Times headline all this good news for the Simon campaign?

Try this: "California GOP Leaders Pessimistic on Top Race."

That report paralleled a story in Friday's Washington Times, which revealed that the Bush White House was considering yanking its support from what it described as Simon's "troubled campaign."

Quoting an unnamed White House source, the paper said the Bush White House would consider the results of an upcoming private survey by the Republican National Committee before deciding whether the president would publicly campaign for Simon when he visits California in late August.

"The president will have access to the poll by the first of next week and will know whether Simon's candidacy is still viable," the Times' source said, adding, "If not, I expect Bush to walk after Labor Day."

Nowhere did the Times story mention, however, that every recent survey shows Simon either trending up or actually leading his opponent.

What has the GOP spooked is the July 31 verdict by a California jury that found a company with ties to the Simon family guilty of fraud. Predictably, the story received saturation coverage by state media and has been featured prominently in every national report on Simon's bid to retake the Golden State for the GOP - not to mention a tsunami of Davis TV ads.

But overlooked by the White House and other weak-kneed GOP'ers is this: Davis' last attempt to gin up a so-called "Simon scandal" failed royally.

For months the Davis campaign had been trying to make an issue out of Simon's decision not to release his tax returns. Then, to force the issue, the Bush IRS, which is inexplicably still run by Clinton appointees, enlisted itself in the Davis campaign by releasing confidential information from Simon's personal IRS filing.

Davis deployed his $30 million campaign war chest and hit the airwaves with a series of blistering TV ads painting Simon as someone who "won't release his tax returns to show he's paying his fair share."

Not only did Davis' scandal campaign not work - it backfired, and in spades - as evidenced by Simon's lead in Survey USA poll, which was released after he took a month of pummeling on the tax issue.

So, what do more recent polls show since news of the so-called devastating Simon jury verdict broke 10 days ago?

We wish we knew. For some mysterious reason, California pollsters have suddenly fallen silent, leaving some suspicious that numbers showing Simon weathering the storm simply aren't being reported.

Instead of wondering whether it should embrace the Republican front-runner in the nation's largest and most politically important state, maybe the Bush White House ought to see to it that the Justice Department does its job by opening a criminal probe into the suspicious release of Simon's tax files.


TOPICS: Extended News
KEYWORDS: calgov2002; misleadingreports; simon
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-43 next last
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Man, I did 3 loads of clothes and used the electric dryer!!

LOL!!! Whatever it takes to get the manure out of Sacramento.
21 posted on 08/10/2002 6:04:29 PM PDT by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: navigator
Maybe, if you took a bath or shower more than once a semester, you might not have to hold your nose. How are things in Berkeley anyway?
22 posted on 08/10/2002 6:38:11 PM PDT by Redleg Duke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Carl/NewsMax
May he win by a landslide. ~Pray~
23 posted on 08/10/2002 7:27:54 PM PDT by pray4liberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach; NormsRevenge
" It's only 5:30 PM here on the West Coast and HOT even near the beach!"

I know what you mean...It got up to 68 degrees here in Eureka today.
24 posted on 08/10/2002 7:53:14 PM PDT by tubebender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: notorious vrc
This makes 25 posts. Do I hear 50?
25 posted on 08/10/2002 9:47:32 PM PDT by NEWwoman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: NEWwoman
No. But you hear 26.
26 posted on 08/10/2002 10:09:31 PM PDT by Euro-American Scum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: tubebender
But you probably get rain and snow!
27 posted on 08/10/2002 10:51:28 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
"But you probably get rain and snow!"

In the 50 years I have lived here it has snowed 6 or 7 times.

BTW, I didn't tell you, we had a record high on Friday of 69 degrees!

28 posted on 08/11/2002 6:29:58 AM PDT by tubebender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Carl/NewsMax
EXCELLENT analysis and article!

Simon Bump!

29 posted on 08/11/2002 7:17:58 AM PDT by Gophack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach; NormsRevenge
I just saw the weather report for the week: 102-109 through Friday. Ughhh! I hate the heat (I'm in Sacramento County) ... but I'll endure ANYTHING to get rid of Gray Davis!
30 posted on 08/11/2002 7:20:14 AM PDT by Gophack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: CounterCounterCulture
We're in this for the long haul.

Ditto for this conservative. I've been a Simon supporter since the beginning, and I'm going to do anything and everything I can to help him.

Go Simon!

31 posted on 08/11/2002 7:21:59 AM PDT by Gophack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: IVote2
Check out this great summary of the Pacific Coin case ... and, for the record, Simon wasn't even NAMED in the lawsuit!!!

Pacific Coin in Capitol Watch

32 posted on 08/11/2002 7:25:35 AM PDT by Gophack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Carl/NewsMax
In an effort to reach out to Democrats in the spirit of bi-partisanship and to save his political capital for more pressing globalist needs and to avoid any chance of being tied to California/Enron enery issues, Bush has indicated a willingness to endorse the Democrat incumbent, Gray Davis for Governor of California. </sarcasm off...for now>
33 posted on 08/11/2002 8:05:14 AM PDT by Nephi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gophack
It became quickly evident in the brouhaha of Simon's "ties" to the company fraud case that he was only peripherally involved. Despite all of the screaming headlines and wailing of glea from the lamestream press, Bill Simon himself is never mentioned as being convicted, nor personally required to pay any fines, nor going to jail, etc.

I'm sure that a lot of Red Davis's campaign chest is paying off any polsters to delay their work product as long as possible. The Gray one is slime of the highest order in negative campaigning, cutthroat politics, inuendo, and lolling in bed with a Marxist press. Methinks I detect the faint aroma of flop-sweat wafting from the already maloderous Davis camp....

34 posted on 08/11/2002 8:28:27 AM PDT by Thommas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Gophack; Ernest_at_the_Beach; farmfriend; Not gonna take it anymore; budwiesest; Carry_Okie; ...
Repellicans are truly a funny lot! Yes, I'm one, too!!!

Debra J. Saunders said it all on KSFO last week... "We Republicans hold our candidates to a higher standard." The minute ANYTHING the least bit unexpected happens that can be connected either directly, or indirectly to put the slightest question in anybody's mind about one of our candidates... You can hear a collective Repellican Party "Oh Sh*t!"

It's the exact opposite of what happens with Demonicrats. Remember how they gathered around the epitome of "Depravitas" after he was impeached and faced trial in the Senate?

All you third party Liberaltarians, etc., there's your ultimate proof of the night & day difference between the two dominant political parties!!! Republicans just die in the face of even phony adversity. Democrats never say die!!!

Republicans would rather switch than fight like Tom Sullivan on KFBK Friday. Democrats close ranks and fight attacks on their candidates, like Demonicrats!!! Republicans kill the greater good in search of perfection.

Ever since Nixon and his "Checkers Speech" and his subsequent resignation in disgrace, Republican get filled with dread (even worse than fear) over the slightest possible situation that would cause them to have to close ranks and properly defend any candidate that failed to disclose ANY unimaginable possible outcome of anything even faintly related to their candidate.

The closest I've ever seen the Repellicans ever come to holding up for their candidate was in fighting off the attempted theft of the 2000 election and that was a fine thing to finally see, indeed!!! I loved finally seeing them circling the Crapitol in the biggest demonstration seen since the Anti-War protestors during Vietnam!!!

Normally, however, they imagine themselves "too nice" to take the white gloves off and hit back against the smell of a deliberate "set-up" like this phony-baloney verdict that is sure to be over-turned on appeal.

35 posted on 08/11/2002 8:49:14 AM PDT by SierraWasp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Carl/NewsMax
"Conservative" candidate Simon recently issued his policy regarding oil drilling in California. He says he will stop all future drilling, specifically coastal drilling.

Disregarding for the moment that Simon has been deeply involved in financing this drilling in the past, and disregarding the fact that California presently produces roughly 20% of US domestic oil and yet still has to import oil to its gasoline refineries, ...

How is it anything but daft to propose the curtailment of future oil drilling in California in the wake of 9/11 and the obvious build up to a war with Iraq??

How is this anything but an enviro-wacko leftwing policy that will destroy any hope of American energy independence from Middle-East oil?

36 posted on 08/11/2002 9:54:28 AM PDT by navigator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SierraWasp
Republicans would rather switch than fight like Tom Sullivan on KFBK Friday.

Missed his show, was he 'switching' or 'fighting'? Not clear.

37 posted on 08/11/2002 10:05:37 AM PDT by budwiesest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: budwiesest
Well... The most popular "Talk Host," in Northern CA was all griped-off that Simon hadn't "disclosed" the negative potential of this active legal battle and his degree of closeness to it!

Saying that anyone with an ounce of political sense knows you get ALL this stuff out right up front! That's why he (Tom) never ran for office when asked because there are some things that probably wouldn't play well with the media shark-pool! It was not fair to President Bush or anyone in the Party to have held this back and that he shoulda done like "W" did about the drinking problem... yada... yada... yada!!!

Just like Deborah K. Saunders in the SFO rag, he was stupidly showing his lack of political acumen by saying that Simon should just step aside now and let some other standard bearer take over. Tom should "stick to business" because as was pointed out on this thread earlier... we've had the primary and write-in campaigns NEVER work!!!

He was sounding so emotional and ignorant that he was embarrassing to a higher degree than anything Simon has done, or not done. The hard part is... I really like Tom and listen to him regularly, even his Saturday replays!!!

38 posted on 08/11/2002 10:43:24 AM PDT by SierraWasp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: SierraWasp
I was going to guess the opposite. Weird. Maybe (as another thread on Bush's speech to assure 'working families' that evil corporations will now be held accountable) it is fashionable now to distance onself from these nasty corporations and their money. Especially since having money is no longer an 'asset' when going against a democrat.
39 posted on 08/11/2002 11:30:24 AM PDT by budwiesest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: navigator
How is this anything but an enviro-wacko leftwing policy that will destroy any hope of American energy independence from Middle-East oil?

One would hope it is one campaign promise he has no intention of keeping.

40 posted on 08/11/2002 12:00:01 PM PDT by wattsmag2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-43 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson