Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: zhabotinsky
Isn't this law the classic 'Unreasonable burden on interstate commerce' and therefore by definition unconstitutional?

Maybe. However, I think the car company approach is going to be to argue to the courts that only the feds have the power to mandate fuel economy standards. Personally, I think they should have financed an initiative so that the voters of California could have slapped this idiotic law down. And they would have.

49 posted on 08/12/2002 9:10:17 AM PDT by John Jorsett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: John Jorsett
Love your profile page!
50 posted on 08/12/2002 9:13:54 AM PDT by dubyagee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

To: John Jorsett
Maybe. However, I think the car company approach is going to be to argue to the courts that only the feds have the power to mandate fuel economy standards.

The feds have enacted legislation that expressly gives California the power to enact stricter standards than those that apply to the rest of hte country. This dates back to the early 70s and the first version of the Clean Air Act.

101 posted on 08/12/2002 11:03:59 AM PDT by the bottle let me down
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson