Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

There is no dignity in our death culture
National Post ^ | October 31, 2003 | Elizabeth Nickson

Posted on 11/04/2003 3:36:19 PM PST by independentmind

Perhaps the culture of death my generation has unwittingly created will only come home to roost when, in our creaky 80s, we face the Futile Care Committee at our local hospital, to be told, well, it's simply too expensive to keep you alive any longer, buster. Inappropriate Care Protocols rule. Say your prayers, and your goodbyes, the lady with the "Aussie Exit Bag" is coming, next Tuesday at 11 o'clock. Death with Dignity. Good of the State. Here's the extension of the Therapeutic Grieving Committee. You can have whatever music you want. '70s? '80s? '60s? My, you are old. And by the way? We're feeling particularly compassionate this morning.

How likely is this? Pretty much inevitable. Thirty more years of federal Liberal health care mismanagement will make it necessary. The drugs for assisted suicide cost about $40. As Derek Humphrey, co-founder of the Hemlock Society, wrote, in his recent Freedom to Die, "the hastened demise of people with only a short time to live would free resources for others," an amount he predicts would run into the "hundreds of billions of dollars." That'll sure help with our ever-yawning debt.

It's unpleasant to think of, I know. And so what, right? We already see life and death through a utilitarian prism. In Canada, where only a few are willing to discuss our failing medical system, we have to be modern. We've spent our way into it.

This was all thrown into relief this week by our Senate about to allow experiments on human embryos, and the U.S. Senate's finally banning partial birth abortion. Parental notification will be next, promised Bill Frist, U.S. Senate leader. After that, murdering the mother and child in utero will be two murders, not one. Then, late last week, Jeb Bush overturned the forced removal of young Floridian Terri Schiavo's feeding tube, allowing her parents another shot at taking care of her. The ACLU hooted and hollered, but most people looked at Terri's wide-boy husband spouting platitudes on Larry King about Terri saying she wanted to die when she was watching a movie once, and thought, this guy wants to go off and play happy families with his two kids by his new girlfriend and forget all this nuisance of feeding tubes and visits. If her parents want her to live, let her live. If there's a chance, a tiny chance, that with rehab, she can eat by herself, let her be fed. When in doubt, choose life.

Schiavo's life could be richer than that. Scientists, like neuropsychologist, Joseph Giancino, believe that, within 10 years, researchers will be able to experiment with implanted electrodes that act like pacemakers for consciousness. By emitting regular pulses of electricity, they could keep the brain's networks active and synchronized. Terri Schiavo is a young woman, within 20 years, she could live at home, have a life. Who knows? If it's possible, even a tiny chance, science turning up one miracle after another, as it does, who would take that life away?

Well the community of bioethicists for one. This relatively new group of academics have taken it upon themselves to advise the good and the great on what life is and should be, and they are certainly behind any legislation having to do with the definition of death. Most famous among them is Princeton's Pete Singer -- so mainstream he wrote the essay on ethics for the Encyclopedia Britannica -- who argues that parents should have the right for a set period of time after each child's birth, whether to kill the child or not. "The wrongness of killing such beings [infants]," says Singer, "is not as great as the wrongness of killing a person."

What counts morally is not being "human" but being a "person," a status earned by possessing identifiable mental capabilities such as being self-aware or having the ability to engage in rational behaviour.

Most bioethicists agree that there are human beings who are not persons and many bioethicists believe that basing moral value and legal rights solely upon being human is capricious, religion-based and irrational. Who doesn't cut it? All embryos, people with Alzheimer's, serious cognitive disorders, and significant developmental incapacities. Needless to say, Not Dead Yet, the disability rights group that fights against legalized assisted suicide, believes that this theory is a dagger blade aimed at the heart of the disabled community.

Personhood theory is well entrenched in the medical establishment, particularly among those transplant professionals who want to redefine death to include a diagnosis of permanent coma or unconsciousness. The thousands of people in such states, at any one time, transplant professionals argue, could have non-essential items like corneas or a single kidney removed. The Pittsburgh Gazette reported last year that "obitiatry," defined by Dr. Kervorkian as experimentation on assisted suicide victims, has already been used on catastrophically ill or injured people with experimental cancer drugs. Last year, in Oregon, where assisted suicide is legal, the HMO, Kaiser/Permanente solicited their doctors for physicians willing to kill patients, that their own physicians refused to kill.

You have to be thinking about money now. Medical and bioethics journals have reported in recent years that futile care protocols have been adopted quietly by hospitals all over the world. Doctors can decide that given finite resources, life-sustaining treatments, even low-tech antibiotics, can be withdrawn.

And money is where the culture of death really comes home to roost. As Wesley J. Smith author of Forced Exit, points out, legalized assisted suicide and euthanasia will take place in the "context of a harsher real world of abuse and neglect of the elderly, family dysfunction, relatives demanding to inherit property or collect fat insurance policies and subtle pressure on the ill, disabled or elderly to cease being a burden." You can choose to die with "dignity." At the price of thousands who will be forced into it.


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: euthanasia; organtransplants

1 posted on 11/04/2003 3:36:19 PM PST by independentmind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: independentmind
Soylent Green!
2 posted on 11/04/2003 3:43:03 PM PST by verity (Have you b**** slapped a reporter today?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: independentmind
This really is disturbing. The "bioethicists" and "medical ethicists" give me the shivers. I saw a little bit of this "futile care" philosophy when my mother-in-law was in the hospital for the last time. She had congestive heart failure, pursuant to a couple of serious health issues, and really was at the end of her life. The "treatment" team explained to use that they weren't going to treat her, just give her "comfort care", because treatment would be futile - she couldn't be cured. Well, of course she couldn't. We knew that. My husband was quite angry, because this "team" hadn't notified her personal physician that she had even been hospitalized. Hubby called her doctor, he came to see her, and prescribed some medication that he thought might ease her a bit, and perhaps extend her life. We bought her enough time to bring her home, so she wouldn't have to die in the hospital.

Die with dignity? Starving and dehydrating someone is dignified?
3 posted on 11/04/2003 3:43:43 PM PST by .38sw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: independentmind
I generally agree with this article.

However, it will at some point become impossible to provide every person on the planet or even in America with every single medical treatment that might keep them alive a little bit longer. It will be impossible both logistically (due to number of caretakers required) and financially.

4 posted on 11/04/2003 3:44:59 PM PST by Restorer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: verity
Soylent Green is Liberals !!! Eat up, gang !! (evil grin)
5 posted on 11/04/2003 4:02:14 PM PST by Salgak (don't mind me: the orbital mind control lasers are making me write this. . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Restorer
However, it will at some point become impossible to provide every person on the planet or even in America with every single medical treatment that might keep them alive a little bit longer. It will be impossible both logistically (due to number of caretakers required) and financially.

Yep it is another CATCH 22 of life

Modern medicine will allow people to live long enough to get to that point
6 posted on 11/04/2003 4:04:31 PM PST by uncbob ( building tomorrow)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: independentmind
I think that we are beginning to discover why the liberals have not been more worried about the impending meltdown of Social Security and Medicare. They have a plan to assure that there really won't be as many elderly people around as has been projected. Trimming the last four or five years off the average lifespan of the elderly should be just about enough to keep the funds in balance.
7 posted on 11/04/2003 4:11:03 PM PST by Stefan Stackhouse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: .38sw
Same sort of thing happened to my Grandmother, against our will, and against her own. But they know what is best you see.
8 posted on 11/04/2003 4:14:08 PM PST by ladyinred (Talk about a revolution, look at California!!! We dumped Davis!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ladyinred
As the article said, futile care protocols have been adopted by hospitals across the country. I am hearing more and more such stories where treatment is withdrawn contrary to the wishes of the person being treated, and the wishes of the family.
9 posted on 11/04/2003 4:35:50 PM PST by .38sw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson