Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Double your Trouble (Kerry fears Edwards & Clintons)
American Spectator ^ | 3/1/04 | The Prowler

Posted on 03/01/2004 3:10:39 AM PST by Elkiejg

Through intermediaries, Sen. John Kerry has been reaching out to the two people who pose the biggest threat to his winning the Democratic presidential nominee: Sen. John Edwards and former President Bill Clinton. "Neither of them seem interested in talking," says a Kerry campaign adviser in Washington.

According to several Kerry campaign sources, senior campaign advisers such as uber-adviser Bob Shrum have reached out to Edwards seeking guidance on what the North Carolinian intends to do after Super Tuesday. Most polls have Edwards lagging, and it is doubtful he will make a big enough splash to remain competitive going into next week's Southern swing.

"We'd like him out sooner rather than later," says another Kerry adviser. "We'd like to have the South all to our selves. Edwards' decision could impact his future down the road."

By that, he means Edwards' chances at the vice presidential nomination. While it has not been discussed, for several days now, Kerry advisers have been dangling that prize out there to reporters in hopes of drawing Edwards into a conversation about quitting the race Wednesday morning.

But Edwards has not budged, and his advisers remain focused on causing some trouble for Kerry down South next week. "Our boss has stated from the beginning he is running for president, not vice president," says an Edwards adviser in North Carolina. "If the Kerry people are talking, we're not listening. It's obvious to us that Kerry doesn't respect us or our man very much."

In several debates, Kerry has been unable to contain his open hostility toward Edwards. While not at the level of Al Gore's eye-rolling, loud-breathing performances in 2000, it has bordered on patronizing contempt. It has also raised questions as to whether Kerry could co-exist with Edwards on the ticket.

"Kerry would do anything to win. If that means Edwards, that is what he will do. Look at his career, his record. The man is a pragmatist," says an Edwards adviser. "He knows he needs us whether it be to step aside, or for balance on the ticket down south. Either way, he is going to have to humble himself some way to get what he wants."

THE EDWARDS CONUNDRUM pales next to the one caused by the other man who has not been returning many of Kerry's calls: Bill Clinton.

The ex-president has been strangely silent on the primary playout over the past few weeks, leading some DNC insiders to fear there is a bombshell Clinton is about to drop, and it is blonde and ambitious.

"Everyone is looking at Hillary and wondering what the hell is going on," says a DNC insider. "It has been way too quiet and people in Kerry's camp are getting nervous."

The nervousness is in part rooted in the nomination process of the Democratic Party. For Kerry to win the nomination, he must have 2,162 delegate votes. He can get that number through any combination of regular delegates (those pledged to a candidate through the primary and caucus process) and superdelegates.

Currently, Kerry leads Edwards in the delegate count, 685 to 201. It is difficult to track superdelegate counts, in part because they are not bound to any candidate up until they begin casting ballots in Boston this summer. Super delegates are made up mostly of high-ranking Democratic Party leaders, including governors, Senators, congressmen, past U.S. Presidents and vice presidents, party chairmen, etc.

And this is what makes Kerry uneasy. Superdelegates are not bound to vote for the candidate who wins a primary or caucus in their respective states. They also can change their mind as often as they like before they cast their vote in Boston. In all, there will be 802 superdelegates in play for the nomination (including both Clintons), and should Kerry enter the convention without a clear and large majority of the bound delegates for the nomination, there are concerns that a bitter battle for the nomination may erupt.

"If Edwards has enough delegates to deny Kerry the necessary votes for the nomination, because Kerry fails to line up the superdelegates he needs, things could get interesting," says a DNC staffer. "At that point, in late spring, early summer, there is nothing that says Bill and Hillary could not emerge and put her name in play as either a presidential nominee or for the vice presidency, particularly if she can muster superdelegate votes."

All of this would have to happen on ballots called after the initial ballot in the convention, and it's a possibility the Kerry camp is aware of. That is one reason Kerry's people are pushing Edwards to quit after Super Tuesday. "We don't want him getting any more delegates after Super Tuesday. We don't need his count going up," says a Kerry adviser in Washington.

NEITHER BILL OR HILLARY HAS given any indication she is mulling stepping into the fray, though DNC types have for a month now been attaching her name to polls to test the appeal of various presidential tickets. There are many who believe a Kerry-Clinton ticket would be untenable for a number of reasons, not least because Kerry would likely end up ceding far too much to the Clintons in return for putting her on the ticket.

But it is also believed by many that if Kerry continues to do well in the polls against President Bush, Senator Clinton at the least would have to make a push for the vice presidency.

"She may not want to be vice president, but she won't have a choice," says a DNC fundraiser. "If Kerry has a legitimate shot at winning, she risks losing her window to run for president to someone else who is on the bottom of the ticket. If the Kerry-Clinton ticket loses, no biggie, she goes back to the Senate and is the frontrunner for 2008. If they win, she's locked in as the presidential nominee in 2012."

According to a Kerry source, the primary season has been in such a state of flux, that it is one reason Clinton has refused to publicly show approval for any candidate, even his hand-picked stalking horse, Wesley Clark. Kerry entreaties to have the president step forward after Super Tuesday to show some level of support for Kerry have thus far gone unanswered.

"The silence on this question has been deafening," says a Kerry adviser. "We know Clinton has told reporters that he has provided advice to us, but that simply isn't true. We have not sought much input from him, if only because of the 800-pound gorilla in the room. His wife."


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2004; edwards; kerry; x42
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 next last
To: familyofman
"Wake up & smell the coffee - Hillary will not be on the dem ticket - neither Pres or VP"

Give it up, cause some people are convinced she will take over the convention. People just don't understand, Hillary's promise to finish out her term is one promise she can not break. Not to mention that democrats would never run two sitting senators.

21 posted on 03/01/2004 5:41:04 AM PST by YaYa123 (@Waiting.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble
doubt that....it will end up in court battles in all 50 states to get her name on the ballot. Will probably get done in NJ or Michigan...but not everywhere.
22 posted on 03/01/2004 5:41:46 AM PST by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: familyofman
"Wake up & smell the coffee - Hillary will not be on the dem ticket - neither Pres or VP. Quit wasting time beating dead horses and pay attention to who the opposition will realy be"

Unfortunately Clinton wields tremendous power in fundraising circles. Hillary has a very large war chest, too large to run for just a senate seat. As of this moment, Hillary is to the right of both candidates and the Rat nominee will have to come back to the middle to avoid a Reagan democrat backlash. Neither Edwards or Kerry will be able to come back to the middle to satisfy the moderate rats.

While I see your point, this has the makings of a brokered convention. I still see it as Clinton and the Governor of New Mexico as the ticket. Hillary will get the libs and mods and Bill Richardson(that his name?) will get the minorities. This is the only possible winning ticket the rats have.

On another note, Clinton has said she will fulfill her obligations and not leave the senate to make a presidential run. Problem here is if she is going to run in 08, that means she either leaves the senate in 06 and waits two years or lie to the people that elected her. I choose lie because this is the Clintons M.O.

23 posted on 03/01/2004 5:43:34 AM PST by EQAndyBuzz (60 Senate seats changes the world!! Bury Kerry in 04!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: familyofman
But the Clintons do weld tremendous power over their party, it's resources, and beyond that, they know where bodies are buried. When Kerry is laid low, hit with some unexpected blow that destroys his chances to win, it will come from behind the scenes Clinton loyalists.
24 posted on 03/01/2004 5:46:13 AM PST by YaYa123 (@Waiting.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Elkiejg
I can see how Kerry would be afraid that Edwards might sue him, but why on earth would he be afraid of the Clintons???
25 posted on 03/01/2004 5:56:19 AM PST by Savage Beast (Whom will the terrorists vote for? Not George W. Bush--that's for sure! ~Happy2BMe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: randita
Yes, Hillary is by far the smartest of all the Democrats. Al Gore's down there close to Wesley Clark; he has an almost Gallic talent for betting on the wrong horse.
26 posted on 03/01/2004 6:05:28 AM PST by Savage Beast (Whom will the terrorists vote for? Not George W. Bush--that's for sure! ~Happy2BMe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog
doubt that....it will end up in court battles in all 50 states to get her name on the ballot. Will probably get done in NJ or Michigan...but not everywhere.

That's why they needed the Wellstone precedent.

Minnesota allowed votes for Wellstone to count for Mondale, even though there were certainly Wellstone absentee voters (who voted before he died) who would not have supported Mondale.

Always wondered about that crash, didn't ya?

27 posted on 03/01/2004 6:07:32 AM PST by Jim Noble (Now you go feed those hogs before they worry themselves into anemia!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: randita
There is a very interesting (and new) factor here; McAuliff has stated that he will not run again as head of the DNC.

If he steps down do the Clinton's have another of their demons to replace him> Or is this a sign that this is the year for her?

Regards,

28 posted on 03/01/2004 6:08:22 AM PST by Jimmy Valentine (DemocRATS - when they speak, they lie; when they are silent, they are stealing the American Dream)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Elkiejg
I find it interesting that the only people that seem oblivious to this is hard-core Democrats - both rank-'n-file - and activists.

But there seems to be a certain willfullness to their obiviousness, almost as if subconsciously they know that they will have to end up supporting her as the nominee - and so they will be able to believe themselves when they protest: "No, it wasn't like you said - with backstage manipulations or anything...it was just how things worked out." Fersure...

29 posted on 03/01/2004 6:10:30 AM PST by ctonious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BigWaveBetty
"I think you can be an honest person and lie about any number of things."
"I have nothing original or profound to say."
"Does Senator Kerry have enough Elvis to beat George Bush?"

30 posted on 03/01/2004 6:13:54 AM PST by Savage Beast (Whom will the terrorists vote for? Not George W. Bush--that's for sure! ~Happy2BMe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: familyofman
Read the transcript of Hillary at the Brookings Institute the other day.

They were all gaga over her, though only God knows why, and she sounded to me like she was running.
31 posted on 03/01/2004 6:15:31 AM PST by cyncooper ("Maybe they were hoping he'd lose the next Iraqi election")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Elkiejg
Edwards-Clinton scares me a lot more than Kerry-Clinton or Kerry-Edwards.
32 posted on 03/01/2004 6:17:51 AM PST by VadeRetro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VadeRetro
Why?

Edwards is not very bright.
33 posted on 03/01/2004 6:18:54 AM PST by cyncooper ("Maybe they were hoping he'd lose the next Iraqi election")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper
Edwards has almost no record to attack. And he looks like a Mod from the British Invasion of the early 60s.
34 posted on 03/01/2004 6:20:44 AM PST by VadeRetro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: uncbob
Well he could promise Hillary a Supreme Court Posting...

ACK! COUGH! SPUTTER! GAG!
(Tooters is finally at a loss for words!)
35 posted on 03/01/2004 6:20:44 AM PST by MaryFromMichigan (We childproofed our home, but they are still getting in)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper
They were all gaga over her, though only God knows why, and she sounded to me like she was running.

There's been a method to the Clinton madness, and now I think I see all of it.

The cat is out of the bag on Kerry's liberal voting record; he's the biggest libby of them all in the senate, and Edwards is second. Hillary is starting to come off as "moderate" in comparison. When Kerry is just destroyed in November for being a rabid, drooling liberal, she'll come across as more moderate than she really is, which will appeal to the core of the Democrat voters who are sick of losers.

This is just the latest step in the setup. Look for Hillary to be on more "conservative" Senate panels too, so she can build a voting record on national defense, spending, etc.

36 posted on 03/01/2004 6:24:42 AM PST by Kieri (Who's waiting for the return of her beloved Farscape!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: VadeRetro
I'm well aware of that.

Remember the old "he lacks gravitas" tack?

Well, Edwards really does, whereas it was a canard launched at Dubya. With circumstances in the world the way they are, Edwards will never fly as presidential material on the order of defeating President Bush.

And that's just the way it is.
37 posted on 03/01/2004 6:26:56 AM PST by cyncooper ("Maybe they were hoping he'd lose the next Iraqi election")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper
Remember how Cheney gave Bush gravitas?

Madame Hillary of the Rose Law Firm, of WhitewaterGate, of the Travel Office firings ...

Never mind!
38 posted on 03/01/2004 6:30:09 AM PST by VadeRetro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: randita
The Clintons have a sixth sense when it comes to recruiting useful idiots. Gore and Clark were easy. Gore was particularly useful because he could be made to look presentable. Kerry's a bit more difficult--not impossible, mind you, but it takes talent to go from hippie to zillionaire in just a few broad strokes, so to speak. But after seeing how dumb Clark really is--I think it surprised even the Clintons--they might not want to bother with propping him up. The Democrat Party abounds with useful idiots; there are so many to choose from. In fact, that's what most of the "Liberals" are.
39 posted on 03/01/2004 6:46:50 AM PST by Savage Beast (Whom will the terrorists vote for? Not George W. Bush--that's for sure! ~Happy2BMe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Elkiejg
This is all as I predicted well over 3 years ago.
40 posted on 03/01/2004 6:52:34 AM PST by doug from upland (Don't wait until it is too late to stop Hillary -- do something today!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson