Movement Calls for Massive Support of Bush and the Opening of an Internal Front

The Movement called, this morning (09:00 AM Tehran's local time), for a massive support of George W. Bush in preparation of the upcoming US Presidential election. The call was made by Aryo B. Pirouznia, of SMCCDI, during an interview made with the popular Los Angeles based "National Iranian TV" (NITV) which broadcasts for Iran, America and Europe.

The Movement's Coordinator who was speaking during a round table, hosted by Cyrus Sharafshahi of NITV, stated: " The dynamic for the Iranian People must be to help the current US President in order to be re-elected. The Man at the White House has been supporting us in our endeavors while his opponents were the same who for years helped and backed the clerics by ignoring our plight and discussing on top of our People's blood. "

Pirouznia added: " We all remember how the Carter administration supported the mullahs and how Ramsey Clark qualified a tyrant, such as Khomeini, as a "Gandhi of his time"..... Same type of demagogy was followed, on the blood of the Iranian People, during the Clinton Administration which offered apologies to this regime and which helped the continuation of its life by promoting the so-called reformists..... Of course, we all remember how Al Gore qualified the Islamic republic regime as "being on the way of becoming democratic" during the famous electoral TV debate he had with Mr. Bush..... Now few years later, the same path is being followed by John Kerry who has qualified, SO FAR, the Islamic regime as a "democracy" and promised to establish ties and to "repair damages" in an e.mail sent to the official Mehr News Agency affiliated to the mullahs regime.... Such an unethical doing was quoted by the official Tehran Times of February 8th.... One must ask him then what is his excuse for such wrong doing when everybody know, since a long time, how much the theocratic regime is rejected and illegitimate?..."

" If we can understand the meaning of all these, then any Iranian of conscience and all those hoping for a better future for their country know what they have to do, just as like as millions of Americans who are standing for their principles and sense of integrity at times that thousands of their sons and daughters are engaged against terror and fanatism in the region...." he added.

The SMCCDI's Coordinator explained then the tactic and strategy which must be adopted by the Iranian Freedomlovers by saying: " SMCCDI thinks that Iranians have 2 parallel tasks in their mission of freeing their country and helping to eradicate the terrorist and fanatic Islamist threat....

...The Iranian Diaspora in the US and especially the Iranian-Americans must support massively President Bush who has been supporting publicly and clearly the Iranians in their legitimate aspirations for Freedom and true Democracy.... They must raise funds for his campaign and vote for him on November 4th. ....They must also denounce the activities of the controversial councils and PACs which are claiming to represent them, in the US, but are in reality the same entities which used of the Americans unawareness and their access beside Democrat circles in order to make believe that the Islamic republic can become a Democratic entity. ...Their heads are the same people who raised funds for Clinton, Gore and now for Kerry and that invited the regime's officials, such as, Kamal Kharazzi and Khatami to various meetings in the US in order to help the face lifting of an ugly and inhuman regime for more than seven years...

....The Iranians of inside must increase their protest actions and demonstrations in view of what's going on in our two neighboring countries.... They must understand that many of the same Arabic speaking or Afghani forces that were used for their repression, along with thousands of Iranian Bassidjis and security appratus, are now engaged in terror activities in Iraq and in Afghanistan.... For so, to help themselves and to help the Americans, "we must beat the regime at its own game by opening a wide scale front of unrest inside the country".... Such actions will force the regime to split its attention and forces while it permits to show how Iranians do have the same common enemy than the Americans and any civilized people..."

The other guests of the round table were Assadollah Morovati and Pari Saffari of the Los Angeles based "Radio Voice of Iran" (KRSI).

Pirouznia added: " We all remember how the Carter administration supported the mullahs and how Ramsey Clark qualified a tyrant, such as Khomeini, as a "Gandhi of his time".

Here's some more interesting commentary on Carter's role in Iran;

"Remember Carter's human rights program, where he demanded the Shah of Iran step down and turn over power to the Ayatollah Khomeini?

No matter that Khomeini was a madman. Carter had the U.S. Pentagon tell the Shah's top military commanders – about 150 of them – to acquiesce to the Ayatollah and not fight him.

The Shah's military listened to Carter. All of them were murdered in one of the Ayatollah's first acts.

By allowing the Shah to fall, Carter created one of the most militant anti-American dictatorships ever."

(Jimmy Carter's Trail of Disaster: | Monday, May 13, 2002 | Christopher Ruddy)

We need to devise a way to go after America's enemies (i.e.Saddam and sons), without having to stay forever and occupy these places. I don't know how to do it, but we need to recognize the need for it before we can devise the method. Muslims only want benevolent dictators, not real freedom. It's engrained in the culture (broad brush, but true for the most part). Otherwise there would already be Muslim democracies already.

This is actually a very simple matter. When a nation has attacked us, is a threat to us or harbors terrorists that are a threat to us we have a right to defend ourselves. The politically correct, blame America-first crowd has our values turned upside down. America does not cause terrorism. America does not cause rogue nations headed by brutal dictators like Saddam Hussein. These nations, dictators, and people have the ability to control their actions. Supposedly they are human beings. Being able to control one's actions is one of the distinctions between humans and animals.

Recognizing who the good guys are and who the bad guys are is paramount in winning the War on Terror. This crap about Religion of Peace, and the innocent people of Iraq and Afghanistan makes me want to puke. They are the damn enemy. The people of these nations, and others (Saudi, Jordan, Egypt, Iran, Yemen, and the list goes on) have either taken action to cause their fates, or have not taken enough action. It is time to motivate these scum to start taking the right actions. (And I am not in favor of some liberal education program to help them figure it out.)

The first thing to understand about these people is that they live in a culture of submission. That is is what Islam means. It can't be too hard to understand this with out a lot psycho-babble. These people have deeply ingrained in them the notion of submission. It is a part of their religion. They are fighting a religious war against America. That is what they call it - a religious war. We don't call it that. It's the Gulf War, the War on Terror, the Iraq War; anything but a religious war.

Understanding where your enemy is coming from is the first step to defeating your enemy. Since our enemy comes from the standpoint of submitting to a religion that wants to wage war on us, we need to change their minds about about their submission. To state it briefly, the enemy needs to submit to America before their religion. This is how your win a religious war. You either kill the enemy, render the enemy incapable of hurting you, or convert the enemy to your way of thinking. Personally, I don't think America should be in the business of religious conversion, so that leaves only the first two options.

Back the where I started this reply; the notion of who is to blame. It is not America's fault, and certainly not my fault as an American tax payer that some religious nut thinks he should wage war on America. I don't like the idea of having to pay to take care of these scum. I don't like the idea of my fellow Americans losing their lives to these scum. I will pay to defend my freedom, and if it comes down to it, I will personally fight to defend my freedom. But America did not start this problem and we should spend no more money or give more lives than required to win this war.

Thus, how do you make these rag heads submit to America. Force is the only way. Being nice is not the way. How do you think Islam makes people submit, it certainly not through peace and beauty. It's about cutting off hands, tongues, beating of women, stoning, and much worse. Cutting off hands is not the way of America's military, so we should focus on what we do better than anyone else in the world - and that is killing and breaking things. After we are finished killing and breaking things, we still have a matter of the cost. This is called war repartions. We should be sucking Iraq dry. We should develop the natural gas industry in Afghanistan, and keep the gas for ourselves. The rest of the world already thinks we are doing this. Perhaps they know better than we do. They expect it, but since they are not so in love with America, they believe we would abuse it.

Lastly, we have the exit strategy. Once we have acquired the appropriate assets to compensate Americans for their efforts of war, we leave. No rebuilding. Let other kind hearted people to pick up the pieces. Many Americans, would probably be motivated to save a starving child in Afghanistan or Iraq. That is fine, but don't mix what the military does and American people do. The military kills and breaks things. The military should do that in the most violent manner possible. That is where the submission comes from. These people will think twice in the future before listening to some religious nut.

Personally, I don't care if our enemy loves America or not. I do care that they respect America. They can hate us, but they must know without any doubt, that if they do anything provactive that we will be on them like ugly on an ape.

P.S. I've been wanting to work "ugly on an ape" into my post for some weeks now, and finally I have done it. This leads to the trivia question: Where did "ugly on an ape" come from?

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.