Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Illinois Rep
If you are really undecided...don't you think you are most likely going to stay home?

The problem with the "undecided", is the assumption they are a static group. Like the poor, people move from wealth to poverty and from poverty to wealth. People's opinions change over time. At any point, the undecides will include some truly clueless people and some people whose opinions are changing. So, attempting to create a rule about there ultimate vote is foolish because. One might be able to make assumptions based on trends and events that have just occured but to create a rule out of past elections and apply them isn't going to work.

32 posted on 09/27/2004 7:45:05 AM PDT by VRWC_minion ( I'll send email telling you where to send check.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]


To: VRWC_minion
I can't see how Rasmussen could be accurate. We're tracking 100m voters over 6 months and the results keep rolling back and forth. One candidate has a one pt lead for 6 weeks, then the other assumes a two pt lead for a month. The challenger is up by 3 for three weeks, then the incumbant turns it around & looks like he may pull away...then uh oh the thing evens out again. This poll drives me nuts.

The polls have to be fairly close, but remember they are designed to make news for the most part and not give us a truly accurate picture.

33 posted on 09/27/2004 7:52:49 AM PDT by Archie Bunker on steroids (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson