1 posted on
07/12/2005 1:59:21 PM PDT by
Chapita
To: Chapita
The fear that our protest of these Aholes will one day be regarded as terrorism is legitimate. I have run into more federal government problems in the past month. You cannot find any aspect of your life without government intrusion. Those who think this crap is no big deal or that some of us are over reacting are fools.
2 posted on
07/12/2005 2:04:08 PM PDT by
satchmodog9
(Murder and weather are our only news)
To: Chapita
Give it a 3 year sunset. That way if a rat gets in the whitehouse it can't be used against "domestic terrorists."
And let's get a very narrow definition of "domestic terrorist." I can see Hillary rounding up abortion protestors and gun owners as domestic terrorists.
3 posted on
07/12/2005 2:16:24 PM PDT by
sergeantdave
(Marxism has not only failed to promote human freedom, it has failed to produce food)
To: Chapita
I disagree with many provisions of the Patriot act, and therefore would be all for leaving sunset provisions in. We would be better served, if the original intent of the US Constitution were followed, and our borders were secure(including all ports of entry).
4 posted on
07/12/2005 2:23:09 PM PDT by
jeremiah
(Patrick Henry said it best, give me liberty or give me death.)
To: Chapita
Not only should the sunset provisions be retained on the Patriot act, they should be added to most other federal legislation.
The first question to ask about giving any enforcement power to the feds is "Would you want President Hillary to have this power?"
6 posted on
07/12/2005 2:31:06 PM PDT by
KarlInOhio
(Bork should have had Kennedy's USSC seat and Kelo v. New London would have gone the other way.)
To: Chapita
Never thought I'd see the day where a thread full of Freepers are all on the same page on this issue.
7 posted on
07/12/2005 2:47:11 PM PDT by
NJ_gent
(Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you; and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson