Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hillary Clinton Re-election Fund Has $12.6B
NewsMax ^ | 7/16/05 | AP

Posted on 07/16/2005 12:07:47 PM PDT by Tumbleweed_Connection

In a Senate race that could have affect the 2008 presidential contest, Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton raised more than $6 million between April and June.

Federal campaign reports filed by Senate candidates Friday showed the former First Lady, a New York Democrat, had $12.6 million cash on hand at the end of last month, even though as yet she has no clear opponent.

Manhattan lawyer Edward Cox, a son-in-law of former President Richard Nixon, has begun preparations to challenge Clinton, and Republican Party officials also are courting Westchester County District Attorney Jeanine Pirro as a possible challenger.

Patti Solis Doyle, executive director of Friends of Hillary, said she expects "very well-funded opposition next year."

Clinton's first campaign for Senate in 2000 smashed fundraising records, as she and her Republican opponent, then-congressman Rick Lazio, together spending about $80 million.

A strong showing in next year's Senate race could give added momentum to Clinton's early frontrunner status among possible Democratic candidates in the 2008 presidential race. A bruising contest could slow her down.

Other closely watched Senate races are in Pennsylvania, where incumbent Republican Rick Santorum is facing a challenge from the son of a former governor, state treasurer Robert P. Casey Jr., and in Florida, where Rep. Katherine Harris is challenging Democratic Sen. Bill Nelson.

Santorum raised $3.6 million in three months and reported $5.7 million cash on hand to Casey's $1.6 million cash on hand.

Harris ended June with $406,808 cash on hand to Nelson's $5 million.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 2006; fundraising; hillary; news
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

1 posted on 07/16/2005 12:07:48 PM PDT by Tumbleweed_Connection
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection

Your heading says $12.6 BILLION...I did a double take.


2 posted on 07/16/2005 12:08:50 PM PDT by sofaman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection

Title error


3 posted on 07/16/2005 12:08:50 PM PDT by rmmcdaniell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Decimal places are our friend
4 posted on 07/16/2005 12:08:53 PM PDT by Quick Shot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection

Gee...if only the Dems could raise that kind of money to eradicate the deficit they keep whining about...


5 posted on 07/16/2005 12:09:19 PM PDT by Prime Choice (Embrace all who seek the truth. Beware all who find it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Your title says 'B' as in billion!

You scared the snot out of me!

6 posted on 07/16/2005 12:09:24 PM PDT by airborne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Boy, 12.6 (B)illion is a bunch!
7 posted on 07/16/2005 12:09:34 PM PDT by digger48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection

"Hillary Clinton Re-election Fund Has $12.6B"
well we might as well give up. hard to fight 12.6 billion!


8 posted on 07/16/2005 12:09:42 PM PDT by jimbergin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection

WOW! Yor headline scared the bejeezus out of me. It says 12.6B (billion). Glad to see it's only 12.6M (million)!


9 posted on 07/16/2005 12:09:44 PM PDT by Arkie2 (No, I never voted for Bill Clinton. I don't plan on voting Republican again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection

I'd ask the mod to correct the 12.6 "B" headline.


10 posted on 07/16/2005 12:09:58 PM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rmmcdaniell

If it's a title error, it's an error that NewsMax made. Their headline does indeed read "Hillary Clinton Re-election Fund Has $12.6B."


11 posted on 07/16/2005 12:10:24 PM PDT by Prime Choice (Embrace all who seek the truth. Beware all who find it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection

The error is Newsmax's fault


12 posted on 07/16/2005 12:10:57 PM PDT by rmmcdaniell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection

That's got to put a dent even in Uncle George's(Soros) change purse.


13 posted on 07/16/2005 12:11:22 PM PDT by digger48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection

The thing I remember about Bob Casey, Sr. is that he got bumped to the top of an organ transplant list.


14 posted on 07/16/2005 12:11:28 PM PDT by airborne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimbergin

Wouldn't it be nice if the bank with 12.6B of her money went belly up (say, major fraud), the whole thing got tied up in the investigation, and finally - few years too late - she was refunded FDIC insurance limit - 100K? One could dream...


15 posted on 07/16/2005 12:12:32 PM PDT by GSlob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Hillary Clinton Re-election Fund Has $12.6B

I guess the White House silverware wasn't the only thing she sneaked out with.

16 posted on 07/16/2005 12:12:32 PM PDT by KarlInOhio (Bork should have had Kennedy's USSC seat and Kelo v. New London would have gone the other way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
For the story behind the story...

Saturday, July 16, 2005 1:41 p.m. EDT

Hillary Clinton Re-election Fund Has $12.6B

In a Senate race tha.......

17 posted on 07/16/2005 12:12:38 PM PDT by Tumbleweed_Connection (Why Hasn't Anyone Asked The NYT About The Leak?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: sofaman

well, it probably does if you include the networks and their free advertising


18 posted on 07/16/2005 12:13:24 PM PDT by InvisibleChurch (Oh, there's i, ii, iii, iv, v, vi, vii,viii, ix, x, xi, xii, xiii, xiv, xv, xvi, xvii, xviii wheels)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sofaman

Me too! The only reason I opened this thread!


19 posted on 07/16/2005 12:14:10 PM PDT by Chapita (There are none so blind as those who refuse to see! Santana)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection

Also there is a new show on in the fall to help get the public used to a female president. I personally would not be surprised to see her taking the next oath of office. There are enough gullible and stupid people in this country that she could possibly do this.


20 posted on 07/16/2005 12:14:53 PM PDT by RadioAstronomer (Senior member of Darwin Central)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson