Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why Bush Picked Bernanke
Wall Street Journal ^ | October 25, 2005 | Fred Barnes

Posted on 10/25/2005 5:24:58 AM PDT by yoe

President Bush knew exactly what he wanted yesterday when he picked a successor to Alan Greenspan as chairman of the Federal Reserve Board. He sought a nominee as risk-free as possible, someone with little chance of either encountering a bitter confirmation fight or, once in office, of opposing his economic policy. So Ben Bernanke, now the chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers (CEA) at the White House, was the logical choice.

In fact, the president had settled on Mr. Bernanke, 51, by late last week, though the actual nomination was not to be announced until later this month or early November. In the meantime, Mr. Bernanke was to begin a series of pre-nomination meetings on Wall Street yesterday to chat with financial leaders. But the meetings were postponed and the announcement of his selection was speeded up -- at the urging of Republican Sen. Richard Shelby of Alabama, chairman of the Senate Banking Committee -- to assure confirmation by Christmas.

[snip]The question now facing President Bush is whether Mr. Bernanke will indeed look sympathetically at his economic policy. I recently asked a strong candidate for the Fed job -- you'll have to guess which one -- if a Fed chairman owes any obligation to the president who appoints him, perhaps adapting monetary policy to the president's liking. The answer was No. So, Mr. President, don't set your hopes too high.

(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bernanke; bush43; fed; fredbarnes

1 posted on 10/25/2005 5:24:58 AM PDT by yoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: yoe
Implementing a specific President's economic priorities is not in the Fed CHairman's job description. Let's hope for our kids' sake that it never is. Even if you like GWB's economic ideas, you may not be so crazy about the next President who gets to appoint a Fed Chairman.
2 posted on 10/25/2005 5:39:14 AM PDT by .cnI redruM (Because change is not something you talk into existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yoe

I think he missed a golden opportunity. Seems this would have been a good time to nominate someone that would be controversial.... just to take some heat off the Miers nomination. :)


3 posted on 10/25/2005 5:41:03 AM PDT by kjam22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yoe

IMHO -- Bernanke will be a disaster. He will destroy the dollar even faster than Greenspan was doing it, Bernanke will just finish the job. Go into google and search "bernanke printing press". Read what this guy has to say about monetary policy.


4 posted on 10/25/2005 5:51:47 AM PDT by Cicero5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yoe

Buy GOLD!


5 posted on 10/25/2005 6:12:02 AM PDT by HuntsvilleTxVeteran (I shot an error into the air. It's still going everywhere. R. A. HEINLEIN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yoe
He sought a nominee as risk-free as possible, someone with little chance of either encountering a bitter confirmation fight or, once in office, of opposing his economic policy.

Isn't that pretty much a given with all his nominations? Wouldn't wanna make the democrats angry don't ya know?

6 posted on 10/25/2005 6:20:45 AM PDT by zeugma (Warning: Self-referential object does not reference itself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cicero5
Yeah, I always had some faith that despite Greenspan's recent poor decision-making, somewhere deep down inside he knew better. He knew that reckless money-creation was wrong, and that some day, when political expediency no longer demanded it, he would try to steer the ship back in the right direction.

Bernanke, on the other hand, is a true believer - a Holy Warrior of stealth inflation and helicopter money. God help us all - but this clown's going to steer us straight into a massive depression.

7 posted on 10/25/2005 6:25:09 AM PDT by Mr. Jeeves (Speaking several languages is an asset; keeping your mouth shut in one is priceless.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: yoe

Greenspan picked him a year ago. Bush merely acquiesced.


8 posted on 10/25/2005 6:36:53 AM PDT by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DManA

Hey, I have an idea. Let's just bash everything that Bush is doing.

Then this site could be just like DU.


9 posted on 10/25/2005 7:07:17 AM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (Liberal Talking Point - Bush = Hitler ... Republican Talking Point - Let the Liberals Talk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: EQAndyBuzz

Not bashing - just a fact.


10 posted on 10/25/2005 8:22:01 AM PDT by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: DManA

"Greenspan picked him a year ago. Bush merely acquiesced." - DManA

Not per the article. It says Greenspan's recommendations were Ferguson and Kohn.


11 posted on 10/25/2005 8:25:12 AM PDT by mdefranc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: mdefranc

The Bush-bashers don't let facts get in the way. They just love to make things up and then discuss them as "fact". LOL


12 posted on 10/25/2005 8:26:52 AM PDT by SONbrad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: mdefranc
That's just for public consumption.
/sarcasm
13 posted on 10/25/2005 8:30:58 AM PDT by Trust but Verify (( ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: mdefranc

He, whom the gods would make chairman is first appointed to the council of econ advisors. This was done with Bernanke 6 months ago.


14 posted on 10/25/2005 8:36:45 AM PDT by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Cicero5

I not only agree with everything you wrote, but I'd also like to add that he's an "inflation hawk" who sees inflation (like Greenie does) where it doesn't exist, and it's fine with him if he kills the economy in efforts to keep inflation under control.

Greenspan has et the table for a recession next year, and Ben won't stop it and will probably add to the problem.

We need the dang FEDS to take their pinkies off of the interest rates, and relax that inflation is the hallmark of a growing economy, and stop setting into motion the coming recession by raising rates and tightening the money supply.

I fear that Ben is no better than the exuberant-fighting guy. Greenie cost me $5000 the day he said that. I've been waiting for him to retire, ever since.

I think the "Maestro" is a jerk.

His successor is no better.


15 posted on 10/25/2005 9:17:58 AM PDT by TruthNtegrity ("I regret that by Saturday I didn't realize that LA was dysfunctional." Michael Brown, 9/27/05)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Cicero5

IMHO -- Bernanke will be a disaster. He will destroy the dollar even faster than Greenspan was doing it, Bernanke will just finish the job. Go into google and search "bernanke printing press". Read what this guy has to say about monetary policy.

Then why did the Dow go up 170 points after he was picked?


16 posted on 10/25/2005 9:39:43 AM PDT by kaktuskid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson