Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

I donno about this one, but Dr. Felber seems like he's had a responsible career.
1 posted on 02/11/2006 4:31:08 PM PST by PatrickHenry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last
To: VadeRetro; Junior; longshadow; RadioAstronomer; Doctor Stochastic; js1138; Shryke; RightWhale; ...
SciencePing
An elite subset of the Evolution list.
See the list's explanation at my freeper homepage.
Then FReepmail to be added or dropped.

2 posted on 02/11/2006 4:32:15 PM PST by PatrickHenry (Virtual Ignore for trolls, lunatics, dotards, scolds, & incurable ignoramuses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry

This article was posted next year.


3 posted on 02/11/2006 4:32:35 PM PST by REDWOOD99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry

Sure. What news. I can just see flying cars in the future. Not a happy thought for anyone in Hampton Roads who has to contend with the drivers from h$ll here.


4 posted on 02/11/2006 4:33:05 PM PST by OpusatFR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry

You wonder why the Klingons have not paid us a visit, then.


5 posted on 02/11/2006 4:33:12 PM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry

Human travel near the speed of light has already been proven and demonstrated countless times already by the French when they retreat.


6 posted on 02/11/2006 4:33:34 PM PST by Screamname (My name is Uninterested Kevin, monkey cousin of Curious George.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry
Felber's research shows that any mass moving faster than 57.7 percent of the speed of light will gravitationally repel other masses lying within a narrow 'antigravity beam' in front of it. The closer a mass gets to the speed of light, the stronger its 'antigravity beam' becomes.

Oh??? If that is truly the case, one of the big barriers to FTL/near C travel vanishes. That was hitting individual atoms at that speed would generate a lethal shower of X-rays and secondary particles.

7 posted on 02/11/2006 4:36:49 PM PST by null and void (<---- Aged to perfection, and beyond...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry

The jury is still out on whether Einstein's equations on general relativity were right, though. That's why they sent up a sattelite last year to test them.



Special relativity is the one that has been proven beyond any reasonable doubt.


8 posted on 02/11/2006 4:37:22 PM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry

Man someday may travel at the speed of light, but bureaucracies will still require at least 30 days to investigate customer complaints.


9 posted on 02/11/2006 4:37:44 PM PST by silverleaf (Fasten your seat belts- it's going to be a BUMPY ride.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry
Sit Down, Shut Up and Hold On cause HERE WE GO AGAIN, AGAIN, AGAIN, AGAIN, AGAIN...
13 posted on 02/11/2006 4:39:22 PM PST by Lancer_N3502A
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry

15 posted on 02/11/2006 4:42:53 PM PST by Lancer_N3502A
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry

I was gonna do this, but I had to fertilize the lawn this weekend.


17 posted on 02/11/2006 4:44:49 PM PST by keithtoo (It's STILL not safe to vote Democrat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry

I also dunno about this one. There are an infinite number of possible solutions. Einstein rejected a 5-dimensional solution because it didn't feel right, which if we might use Einstein's gut as a guide, makes solutions less than nessarily true even if they are exact.


18 posted on 02/11/2006 4:44:50 PM PST by RightWhale (pas de lieu, Rhone que nous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry

NasaSpaceFlight.com is carrying the story, too...

An abstract from one of his papers on the subject (paper is readable in PDF)
http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0505098


Shows up in Nasa Daily, too... for Feb 10.

Looks fairly legit, not a crackpot physicist.


19 posted on 02/11/2006 4:46:34 PM PST by Knitting A Conundrum (Act Justly, Love Mercy, and Walk Humbly With God Micah 6:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry
I donno about this one, but Dr. Felber seems like he's had a responsible career.

I just object to the idea of referring to it as "The Felber Drive"..

" Cap'n, the Felbers are out, we canna escape the Darwinians ! "

" That strange feeling as we approach Light Speed is known as the Felber Effect.."

" We're approaching Felber Speed, Sir ! "

No, I don't like it.. I don't like it at all....

20 posted on 02/11/2006 4:46:50 PM PST by Drammach (In the kingdom of the blind, the one-eyed man is king..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry
The field equation of Einstein's General Theory of Relativity has never before been solved to calculate the gravitational field of a mass moving close to the speed of light. Felber's research shows that any mass moving faster than 57.7 percent of the speed of light will gravitationally repel other masses lying within a narrow 'antigravity beam' in front of it. The closer a mass gets to the speed of light, the stronger its 'antigravity beam' becomes.

Hmmm, an offshoot of the hypervelocity penetrators from the DoD? ;-)

Look at it this way, you have a 1-kg projectile going at 0.57 c. It is headed for a 50-ton tank initially at rest. From F=ma, there is NO WAY the repulsive force from the penetrator is going to accelerate the tank out of the way before impact. Scratch (and dent, and obliterate) one armored vehicle.

Full Disclosure: Yes, I knew people who worked on supercomputer modeling of projectile-armor dynamics. What of it?

Second Disclosure: YES, I *read* the article, and *YES* I'm aware that that's not what it's really about. . .

Cheers!

21 posted on 02/11/2006 4:47:25 PM PST by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry

Thats all well an good... can we go back to the Moon already?


23 posted on 02/11/2006 4:49:51 PM PST by operation clinton cleanup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry

Improbability Drive?


24 posted on 02/11/2006 4:51:35 PM PST by bikepacker67 (Islam was born of Hagar the whore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Physicist
It's the year 2000. I was promised a flying car. There are no flying cars. I don't wee any flying cars. Why? Why? Why?
25 posted on 02/11/2006 4:52:24 PM PST by martin_fierro (< |:)~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry
I donno about this one, but Dr. Felber seems like he's had a responsible career.

Yeah, but as a project administrator, according to this. Also, he's kind of old to be doing innovative work; I suspect if there's anything to this at all, he's fronting for some much younger guys.

27 posted on 02/11/2006 4:53:56 PM PST by Grut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry
So if you get to .57 the rest is free? How do you slow down?
30 posted on 02/11/2006 4:56:46 PM PST by VadeRetro (Liberalism is a cancer on society. Creationism is a cancer on conservatism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson