To: VadeRetro; Junior; longshadow; RadioAstronomer; Doctor Stochastic; js1138; Shryke; RightWhale; ...
| SciencePing |
An elite subset of the Evolution list.
See the list's explanation at my freeper homepage.
Then FReepmail to be added or dropped. |
|
|
|
2 posted on
03/25/2006 11:14:27 AM PST by
PatrickHenry
(Yo momma's so fat she's got a Schwarzschild radius.)
To: PatrickHenry
Great article. This looks like it could be a Nobel Prize in the making, if the results turn out to be valid. (Note the very big 'if'. Just a hunch that they'll have trouble convincing a lot of reviewers that the effect isn't attributable to a systematic error without a lot more testing.)
8 posted on
03/25/2006 11:38:11 AM PST by
Quark2005
(Confidence follows from consilience.)
To: PatrickHenry
To: PatrickHenry
I have to admit, I really have trouble getting my brain around this story. Maybe the fourth or fifth attempt at a popularization will trigger some synthesis of what's going on. It took that long with the famous "double slit" experiments.
68 posted on
03/25/2006 6:43:49 PM PST by
VadeRetro
(I have the updated "Your brain on creationism" on my homepage.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson