Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lockheed Martin C-5M Super Galaxy Makes Historic First Flight
Yahoo! News ^ | Monday June 19, 3:34 pm ET | Press Release

Posted on 06/21/2006 8:45:38 PM PDT by Paleo Conservative

MARIETTA, Ga., June 19 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ -- The newly modernized Lockheed Martin (NYSE: LMT - News) C-5M Super Galaxy took to the skies for the first time today from Dobbins Air Reserve Base, Ga. This modernized C-5M safeguards the U.S. government's capability to move massive amounts of cargo as the workhorse for the U.S. Air Force global reach mission and ensures the most cost effective, viable strategic airlift resource for America through the year 2040.

"This unique aircraft has provided the U.S. Air Force and our nation with an incredible capability since it first started supporting our country's strategic air mobility requirement to move massive amounts of cargo and troops," said George Shultz, Vice President, Lockheed Martin C-5 Modernization program. "Supporting our country's global reach mission has been a priority for Lockheed Martin since the C-5 program began. This new aircraft, unlike any other in the world, provides the United States with unmatched capability into the future and unmatched operational cost savings to enable the Air Force to divert operational savings to other high priority needs. It's great to be part of the team that ensures that the U.S. will have airlift capability that only the C-5 can provide well into this century."

The C-5M includes avionics modernization, along with reliability enhancement and re-engining. "This new technology provides the Air Force with more powerful fuel saving engines and higher aircraft availability than in the past and will mean unprecedented operational and maintenance savings. The Air Force prudently invested in this modernized aircraft and it's proving to be the most cost effective solution for the Air Force to maintain strategic airlift capability into the future," said Shultz.

"It's a big day for the Air Force, Air Mobility Command and the C-5 team. The C-5 will save over 20 billion dollars, it pays for itself and them some," said Col. Kevin Keck, C-5 Systems Group Commander. "It's a one of a kind aircraft in strategic airlift with the ability to carry twice as much cargo as other systems. It's a force multiplier."

The C-5 fleet with more than 2 million flight hours has been the backbone of strategic airlift in every military engagement from Vietnam through Operation Iraqi Freedom. It is the only aircraft capable of carrying 100 percent of certified air-transportable cargo, with a dedicated passenger compartment enabling commanders to have troops and their equipment arrive in an area of operation simultaneously.

The Avionics Modernization Program adds a new modern cockpit that includes a digital all-weather flight control system and autopilot, a new communications suite, flat panel displays, and enhanced navigation and safety equipment to ease crew workload and enhance situational awareness. An important component of the Reliability Enhancement and Re-engining Program is the new General Electric CF6-80C2 commercial engine. This engine delivers a 22 percent increase in thrust, a 30 percent shorter take-off roll, 58 percent faster climb rate and will allow significantly more cargo to be carried over longer distances.

Headquartered in Bethesda, Md., Lockheed Martin employs about 135,000 people worldwide and is principally engaged in the research, design, development, manufacture, integration and sustainment of advanced technology systems, products and services. The corporation reported 2005 sales of $37.2 billion.



TOPICS: Business/Economy; Extended News; Government
KEYWORDS: c5; c5m; lockheed; lockheedmartin; miltech; rerp
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-162 next last
To: Paleo Conservative
Decompression sickness if the proper punishment for these bastards. Give them the bends until their joints bubble like champagne.

I hope those CF6-80C2 Engines don't have that metallic whine/grinding sound that the current engines have, at least a low altitude. My employer is located directly under the landing pattern of the Reserve schoolhouse for the C-5. A very irritating sound, although not all that loud.

Wonder why they went from "B" to "M" rather than "C"?

21 posted on 06/21/2006 9:12:29 PM PDT by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

How does the C-5 compare in size to the A-380?


22 posted on 06/21/2006 9:13:27 PM PDT by GarySpFc (Jesus on Immigration, John 10:1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Kenny Bunkport
Looks like a giant lawn dart.

That's just flight test instrumentation, the production version won't have the big orange boom.

23 posted on 06/21/2006 9:13:44 PM PDT by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Kenny Bunkport

When I was a lad living in San Antonio, I lived under the one of the approaches to Kelly AFB; On occasion, the radio chatter of approaching C-5s could be heard...through the TV.

To this day, one of my favourite sounds is that of engines of a C-5 - very distinctive.


24 posted on 06/21/2006 9:15:23 PM PDT by Army Air Corps (Four fried chickens and a coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

Super-G props!!!! Not that I know a damn thing about it but I like any military flying machine


25 posted on 06/21/2006 9:15:30 PM PDT by dennisw (You shouldn't let other people get your kicks for you - Bob Dylan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JRios1968

Dixon here.


26 posted on 06/21/2006 9:15:43 PM PDT by Kenny Bunkport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative
Lots of changes since I saw my first C-5.. summer of '71 it was, at Vandenberg AFB. Our flight commander was facing the airfield, with the rest of the flight facing him. He was blabbing about something or other (good guy though, he was my roommate for the second half of the ROTC field training and was the first commander because he'd had lots of CAP experience, had been the 4 year program (we were 2 year program) but had to lay out do to illness or something) He stopping in mid blab, called us to attention (we were at ease) and then "about..face". The bird was pretty new in those days.
27 posted on 06/21/2006 9:17:30 PM PDT by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: El Gato

There are already 2 C-5C's, both located at Travis AFB. They are originally C-5A's, and were modified to carry Space Shuttle components, by having their troop compartments removed, and special cargo doors installed in the aft section. These are the only C-5's that never leave the United States.

The M in C-5M stands for...are you ready?..."Modernized." At least that's what the Lockheed dudes tell us.


28 posted on 06/21/2006 9:19:07 PM PDT by JRios1968 (There's 3 kinds of people in this world...those who know math and those who don't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: El Gato
Wonder why they went from "B" to "M" rather than "C"?

The C-5C model already exists. Two C-5A's were modified to transport space payloads for NASA and the DOD. One of them did a landing without nosegear just prior to its modification. They had cracked skin replaced by new metal using the same aluminum alloys used in the C-5B. The upper deck troop carrying compartment was removed to allow more space for extra large cargo, and new improved landing gears were installed.

I think "M" stands for "modernized". The M designation will apply to both converted C-5B's and C-A's, and the C-5C's will also undergo the AMP and RERP

29 posted on 06/21/2006 9:25:18 PM PDT by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: JRios1968
Do you remember the hangar number? I will bet it was either Building 810 or 818.

This was a washrack hanger. It was used exclusively to wash off returning flights. It had an overhead gantry that traversed the hanger and was used with a high pressure washer system to clean the C-5's. My contract was to work on the drainage system inside the building and the separators it fed. This must have been in the late 80's.

30 posted on 06/21/2006 9:25:43 PM PDT by umgud (FR, NASCAR & 24, way too much butt time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

Great minds have the same resources!


31 posted on 06/21/2006 9:28:24 PM PDT by JRios1968 (There's 3 kinds of people in this world...those who know math and those who don't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: umgud

That would be Building 811, then. It's capable of handling anything the AF can fly. Buildings 810 and 818 are even larger!


32 posted on 06/21/2006 9:29:12 PM PDT by JRios1968 (There's 3 kinds of people in this world...those who know math and those who don't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: El Gato
I hope those CF6-80C2 Engines don't have that metallic whine/grinding sound that the current engines have, at least a low altitude. My employer is located directly under the landing pattern of the Reserve schoolhouse for the C-5. A very irritating sound, although not all that loud.

That is a controversial sentiment. There are several Freepers (me not included) who love that sound. I won't miss the sound of the weekly C-5 the local naval air station gets. As I said in post #19, the new engines are very similar to the ones used on the 747-400 and are much quieter. Also since there have been over 2,500 CF6-80's built, there should be much less trouble maintaining the new engines on the C-5M over the life of the program.

33 posted on 06/21/2006 9:30:35 PM PDT by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative
No, I saw an Air-Force-One-style plane land at Dobbins. I thought it was the President at first, but it probably wasn't.

But it makes sense if other dignitaries landed there -- to see this historic flight (later on that day).

34 posted on 06/21/2006 9:30:49 PM PDT by Lazamataz (First we beat the Soviet Union. Then we became them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JRios1968

If I remember correctly, everything but the tail fin fit in this hanger. I did a lot of work at Travis between 1985 to the mid 90's. I do a lot of base contracting in the western states, but it's been quite awhile since I've been to Travis.


35 posted on 06/21/2006 9:32:00 PM PDT by umgud (FR, NASCAR & 24, way too much butt time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: GarySpFc
How does the C-5 compare in size to the A-380?

Bigger cargo volume but lower gross weight.

36 posted on 06/21/2006 9:32:24 PM PDT by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative
I used to live near Hanscom AFB and they would get a C-5 in there from time to time and you could always tell when one was taking off or landing. We lived near the end of the main runway and when a C-5 was ready to take off, our windows would rattle, the furniture would vibrate and the cat would dive for cover. It also has a rather distinctive and impressive engine sound.

From time to time, if I heard it taxiing for takeoff, I would run over to the FamCamp (camping area for visiting family members) and watch it take off. I would frequently marvel that the thing could get into the air at all.

37 posted on 06/21/2006 9:36:23 PM PDT by Reaganesque
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

My only question is, Why does it fly???


38 posted on 06/21/2006 9:37:45 PM PDT by Iscool (I spent MOST of my MONEY on cold beer and hot women...The REST, I just wasted ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Iscool

The Bernoulli effect.


39 posted on 06/21/2006 9:40:02 PM PDT by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

LOL


40 posted on 06/21/2006 9:45:34 PM PDT by Danae (Anál nathrach, orth' bháis's bethad, do chél dénmha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-162 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson