Posted on 08/22/2006 12:18:22 PM PDT by rface
The ACLU is trying to restrict the Gideons from handing out Bibles to fifth-graders at an elementary school in Missouri.
For years the superintendent of the South Iron R-1 School District in Annapolis, Missouri, has permitted various groups to present information to students at district schools. The open access policy in the district has allowed such groups as Red Cross, Boy Scouts, Girl Scouts, and Union Pacific Railroad to have access to the students during classroom time. The Gideons International, which annually places and distributes more than 63 million Scriptures worldwide, has had access to schools during a study period.
Now, however, The Gideons has been singled out in a lawsuit filed by the American Civil Liberties Union of Eastern Missouri, which claims that last fall two Gideons representatives were permitted to address fifth-graders during class time and then distribute New Testaments to them -- an action the ACLU says is unconstitutional. The lawsuit seeks an injunction prohibiting the South Iron Schools from continuing to allow outside visitors into their classrooms for religious purposes.
Orlando-based Liberty Counsel has joined with conservative author and commentator David Limbaugh in defending South Iron against the lawsuit. Mat Staver, founder and chairman of Liberty Counsel, says the attacks against the school district are unfounded.
"An open access policy under the First Amendment requires that you treat religious speech equally," Staver explains. "The ACLU may not like the idea that they have to treat religious speech equally, but the fact of the matter is the Constitution demands it. So we're now defending this ACLU lawsuit which we believe, frankly, is frivolous."
Beyond that consideration, Liberty Counsel has added motivation to be involved in the case, says the attorney. "I think it's important to stand up in this particular case because if the ACLU had its way, it would literally shut down religious speech; it would be discriminating intentionally against religious speech, whereas all the other forms of secular expression have their way in the marketplace," says Staver.
Religious viewpoints are protected under the First Amendment, adds the Liberty Counsel founder, but "the ACLU wants to silence [religious] expression. They want all this [other] information to come as a free flow to the students, but not religious information -- in this case, specifically, no Bibles," he comments. "I think it's very important for our religious freedom and certainly for our constitutional liberties to stand up against the bullies of the ACLU."
Two years ago, the ACLU was successful in shutting down The Gideons' scripture distribution in another Missouri school district. In June 2004 the Smithville R-II School District settled a federal lawsuit filed by the ACLU, agreeing that it would not "aid, abet, or assist in the distribution of Bibles to school children on school premises," or "grant permission to any non-student to distribute Bibles on school premises." That lawsuit had been filed by a Catholic father of three. The court-ordered agreement was to remain in effect for as long as the man has children enrolled in Smithville schools.
According to the ACLU Religious speech is not protected ... only freedom FROM religious speech is protected.
What happens if CAIR shows up to hand out Qu'rans? Seems to me that they'd pretty much have to allow it.
That situation already exists in a slightly different form. It is being reported that Fordson High School in Dearbornistan, MI which is 95% Islamic has put aside special prayer rooms and time for prayer during the school day.
The Dearborn Bd of Ed will not answer inquiries about this. The ACLU in the Detroit area refuses to investigate.
Different strokes for different folks?
Alas, it's only a real Koran if it's in Arabic.
Gee, what does the ACLU fear? Whatever happened to the free marketplace of ideas? /sarc
The Islamic faith requires that it's adherents pray every day at specific times. The Christian faith does not, nor does any other faith that I know of. So it could be argued (and doubtless is) that Moslem students would be denied the right to practice their faith if this was not done, whereas doing this for other faiths would be a special privilege. Not that I agree with such a viewpoint, but it's something to hang a legal argument on.
It's a pretty poor argument. All Christians have to do is claim a similar duty. The ACLU would be all over it.
Low volume ping list
Please FReepmail me to be on, or off, this ping list.
Yes, but schools can pass out condoms and probably manuals for starting a Jihad.
I'd be interested to see any history at all of any Christian sect that currently has that practice. Because that's what it would take. Islam has a long-established tradition of requiring daily prayers during the time periods that school is in session, but I don't think Christianity does.
Still, I think a good argument could be made that if Moslem students are given prayer privileges and a special place to do it, other religions should get the same.
The ACLU needs to learn how to read--and read the Constitution.
One if you want it!
Freepmail wagglebee or little jeremiah to subscribe or unsubscribe from the moral absolutes ping list.
FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
So do the liberal judges who uphold their cases !!!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.