One portion of our voting sector was brainwashed into believing there would be a draft in Mr Bush's second term, "untrained skeptics"...
You presented some facts and asked some open ended questions.
You never really bothered explaining your interpretation of those facts.
You just ask some more open ended questions when you don't like the answers I give to your questions.
If you feel it's not worth the effort to explain your interpretation of the facts, or discuss why you might disagree with my interpretation, then I guess I have to question if you really know what your opinions are or have a sound basis for them.
You apparently are only willing or able to hint at them rather than explain them and support them.
One portion of our voting sector was brainwashed into believing there would be a draft in Mr Bush's second term, "untrained skeptics"...
Yes, there are many people out there that are attracted to a variety of different philosophies that find conspiracy theories such as the one about the draft appealing.
The way to combat conspiracy theories is to carefully look at the facts and see if the theory is soundly supported.
The way to propagate conspiracy theories is to mention a few facts, ask a lot of open ended questions, and make statements vague allegations not soundly supported by the facts.
So do you actually have a point you are trying to make?
Or are you just going to try and make vague comments linking my board name with brainwashed people who are easily swayed by conspiracy theories?
Do you actually have something to say? Or are you just trolling?