Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Fedora
There might have been a time (forty or so years ago) when a KGB mole in the Democratic Party would have had something to do. Not now.

How would you flush a KGB mole out of the Democratic Party? It isn't looking for a needle in a haystack. It would be looking for a bit of hay in a haystack.

Seriously, what would a KGB mole do? Get the Democrats to push for stealth socialism? The Pubbies do that half the time. Get the Democrats to sow defeatism? Pat Buchanan does that every time.

What would a KGB mole do?

104 posted on 10/23/2006 6:29:43 PM PDT by VadeRetro (A systematic investigation of nature does not negotiate with crackpots.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: VadeRetro

Well, KGB would refer to actual espionage activity, as opposed to pushing socialistic public policies, and I suppose they could still engage in espionage activity (though it'd be cheaper for them to just read the NYT). . .but your point is taken. A friend from France who moved here once told me that he could see no significant difference between the French socialists' policies and the Democrats' policies, the only difference was that the Democrats didn't call themselves "socialists".


107 posted on 10/23/2006 7:02:21 PM PDT by Fedora
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson