Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

The difference is those "animal rights protesters" would have been there even if it was a white, Hispanic, or Asian athlete.

I seriously doubt any of the blacks supporting Mike Vick's right to due process would be there if he were of another race.

I'm sometimes disappointed how people in this country (and blacks usually more so) can turn anything into a racial issue. This really should have nothing to do with race.

1 posted on 07/27/2007 12:31:49 PM PDT by Michael2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last
To: Michael2001

“The thing is, the “animal rights people” here were an estimated 90 percent white. The pro-Vick/due process crowd was probably 95 percent black.”

It is racial... had Vick been white... you would still have the same animal rights people there... but there would be no “black” people there on the white man’s defense. sorry to say this but it’s true. you might have had a few die-hard Falcons fans there but they wouldn’t have been 95% black.


2 posted on 07/27/2007 12:36:29 PM PDT by cjohnson1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Michael2001

Sounds like OJ all over again.


3 posted on 07/27/2007 12:37:30 PM PDT by Sig Sauer P220
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Michael2001
"These folks have convicted a man who hasn't even had a chance to defend himself," said Smith.

No, they haven't. None of them is a judge or on a jury, so they have no power to convict anyone, no matter what they think he's done.

The Constitution binds the government to due process of law, not individuals. As long as no private citizen commits assault or another crime against Mr. Vick, he's perfectly within his rights to consider Mr. Vick guilty.

4 posted on 07/27/2007 12:38:17 PM PDT by Tax-chick ("Go ahead and water the lawn - my give-a-damn's busted.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Michael2001

These two lines stood out....

>>Like Smith, almost all of the people supporting Vick or holding signs pleading for “due process” and “innocence until proven guilty” were African American.

On the other side was an emotional, angry, passionate anti-Vick group that was overwhelmingly white. <<

So neither side was exclusively anything.
That’s about right.


5 posted on 07/27/2007 12:39:17 PM PDT by netmilsmom (To attack one section of Christianity in this day and age, is to waste time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Michael2001
I seem to recall some notorious cases in (let's say) NYC where the cops tragically shot an unarmed man standing in a doorway. Boy, there were calls for blood then. By the next morning, it was real clear those cops were guilty! guilty! guilty! Yes sir, not much doubt about it!

I'm sure that had nothing to do with the racial makeup of the players. We are a sad country for many reasons, but our hangups about skin color really eats at me.

6 posted on 07/27/2007 12:40:15 PM PDT by ClearCase_guy (Progressives like to keep doing the things that didn't work in the past.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Michael2001

Did anyone watch Geraldo on O’Reilly last night? He said something about “getting the White guys in the South who watch hogs fight pit bulls.” Anyone have the direct quote, I didn’t see or hear it.


7 posted on 07/27/2007 12:41:09 PM PDT by ConservativeStatement
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Michael2001

Ya knew someone would place the race card sooner or later.

MR. Vick and his cohorts are innocent till proven guilty. But if they are proven guilty, I hope the book is thrown at them.


10 posted on 07/27/2007 12:45:17 PM PDT by fatnotlazy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Michael2001

How long before Al and Jesse start the ‘’racist’’ drumbeat?


11 posted on 07/27/2007 12:45:30 PM PDT by Lexington Green (There ain't no news in the news no more.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Michael2001
"These folks have convicted a man who hasn't even had a chance to defend himself,"

Yet, I bet you had no issue with the Duke Lacrosse case.

Funny that.

12 posted on 07/27/2007 12:46:46 PM PDT by Puppage (You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Michael2001

And while these pro-Vick protesters are protesting the animal rights protesters based on the “constitution”... I believe it’s that same constitution that gives the animal rights protesters the right to protest!


13 posted on 07/27/2007 12:48:00 PM PDT by cjohnson1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Michael2001

Sheff said them dogs be racist


14 posted on 07/27/2007 12:52:10 PM PDT by italianquaker (When will pelosi ask congressman ellison to apologize for his 9-11 remarks?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Michael2001

“These folks have convicted a man...”

Really? When did he get put in jail?


15 posted on 07/27/2007 12:52:15 PM PDT by CSM ("The rioting arsonists are the same folks who scream about global warming." LibFreeOrDie 5/7/07)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Michael2001

Re: “These folks have convicted a man who hasn’t even had a chance to defend himself,” said Smith.

What a moron. They are expressing their OPINIONS. The courts will render the VERDICT.

Or is in not acceptable to express opinions anymore?


16 posted on 07/27/2007 12:54:39 PM PDT by Red in Blue PA (Truth : Liberals :: Kryptonite : Superman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Michael2001

Re: “I wouldn’t say it’s a racial thing,” said David Williams, an African American, in a hopeful tone. “It’s not racial. But for these animal rights people to take one person and crucify him isn’t fair.”

I agree.

Throw water on him and electrocute him.


17 posted on 07/27/2007 12:56:18 PM PDT by Red in Blue PA (Truth : Liberals :: Kryptonite : Superman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Michael2001

I said to my wifey when this story broke, wonder how long before racism is injected.


18 posted on 07/27/2007 12:58:01 PM PDT by Cuttnhorse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Michael2001
On a related note...

Arizona sheriff says Vick not involved in dog fighting case

So who was the other player....?

19 posted on 07/27/2007 12:59:38 PM PDT by mewzilla (Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Michael2001

Re: Two black women held a sign declaring: “I support Mike Vick due process.” That caused vocal jeering from the protesters

I would jeer it too.....horrendous grammar.


22 posted on 07/27/2007 1:02:07 PM PDT by Red in Blue PA (Truth : Liberals :: Kryptonite : Superman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Michael2001

Well we all know that white people are prejudiced and racist.

You could say it is inherent to the white race....

(/sarcasm)


23 posted on 07/27/2007 1:09:18 PM PDT by Tzimisce (How Would Mohammed Vote? Hillary for President! www.dndorks.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Michael2001

“These folks have convicted a man who hasn’t even had a chance to defend himself,” said Smith. “They just forget everything about America.”

This guy Smith either doesn’t know the history of this case, or is a complete idiot.

Michael Vick had an opportunity to defend himself from day one.

He was asked by the local PD if he knew anything about this. He lied and said NO.

He was asked by the league the same. He lied and said NO.

Owner of the Falcons asked the same, he Lied and said NO.

He lied about owning a dog kennel. He lied about owning pit bulls.

He even lied about selling the house, folks. Over a month ago he said he sold it. There is no record of a title transfer as of this morning in that jurisdiction, no bill of sale, no buyer listed anywhere.

He had time to defend himself, under the laws as they exist in our Constitution.

He REFUSED. He OBSTRUCTED a local AND Federal investigation at every step, every turn.

So far, he’s guilty of everything I’ve written in this post.

And I have yet to say a thing about the dogs, the cruelty, and the applicable statuetes related to interstate crime, criminal conspiracy, tax evasion, health violations, etc etc etc.

This isn’t about race. Its about rank stupidity by a sociopath.


24 posted on 07/27/2007 1:09:27 PM PDT by Badeye (You know its a kook site when they ban the word 'kook')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Michael2001

What happened to Ron Mexico’s thug hairdoo?


25 posted on 07/27/2007 1:11:16 PM PDT by Niteranger68 (Stick to talking about your own candidate. We’re smart enough to figure out the rest on our own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson