Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Franken's Old Playboy Article Concerns Democrats
Associated Press ^ | May 29, 2008

Posted on 05/29/2008 10:46:31 PM PDT by Free ThinkerNY

Senate candidate Al Franken's satirical and explicit take on virtual sex and other topics, published in Playboy magazine eight years ago, is drawing concern instead of laughter from some Minnesota Democrats.

Rep. Betty McCollum, who supported the comedian's rival Mike Ciresi until he dropped out of the race for the party's nomination for the Senate, complained Thursday that she and other Minnesota Democrats will be on the same November ballot as a candidate "who has pornographic writings that are indefensible."

"Do they spend all of their time defending him, or do they spend their time talking about issues that are important to this election?" McCollum told The Associated Press in an interview. "The whole story was a shocking surprise."

Franken, a former "Saturday Night Live" writer and performer and a best-selling author, is the Democratic front-runner to take on Republican Sen. Norm Coleman. Minnesota Democrats hold an endorsing convention next week and a primary Sept. 9.

"Al understands, and the people of Minnesota understand, the difference between what a satirist does and what a senator does," Franken campaign spokesman Andy Barr said. "It's unfortunate that she's trying to create divisions in our party rather than working with other DFLers (Minnesota Democrats) to take on the special-interest senator."

Two other Minnesota Democrats in the House, Keith Ellison and Tim Walz, also expressed concerns about the 2000 satirical article that Republicans began circulating last week. None of the critical House members called on Franken to step aside.

(Excerpt) Read more at newsmax.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; US: Minnesota
KEYWORDS: alfranken; mn2008; normcoleman; playboy

1 posted on 05/29/2008 10:46:32 PM PDT by Free ThinkerNY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

Let me see if I have this right...This is the party of those who backed Bill Clinton in his Oral Office fiasco?? Give me a break. Keep writing Al, let’s put Norm back in.


2 posted on 05/29/2008 10:50:58 PM PDT by sola gracia (Living in Victory because of the Cross)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

Please, Please, Please let us keep this seat in the Senate because this schmuck in their nominee.

We are going to need some luck as well as some mistakes on their part in order to survive this November without incurred major damage. And if we lose MN, we’ll not likely ever get one of those two Senate seats back again since the state has gotten darker blue.

Norm Coleman isn’t my favorite Senator but he will be lightyears ahead of any democrat from MN.


3 posted on 05/29/2008 10:52:22 PM PDT by bpjam (Drill For Oil or Lose Your Job!! Vote Nov 3, 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY
"It's unfortunate that she's trying to create divisions in our party...

Gee, there sure seems to be a lot of divisiveness going on in the party that places such a premium on "unity".

You don't think all that talk about unifying the country is just so much bullsh*t do you?

4 posted on 05/29/2008 10:53:56 PM PDT by Texas Eagle (Could pacifists exist if there weren't people brave enough to go to war for their right to exist?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

How about trying to defend is decades old propaganda “gag” he told on SNL “news” about how the troops wives were cheating on them back in America?

It was his “message” to the troops.

Axis Sally demands a pardon because this jerk isn’t on trial for treason under the same standard she was convicted.


5 posted on 05/29/2008 10:59:19 PM PDT by weegee (We cant keep our homes on 72 at all times & just expect that other countries are going to say OK -BO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texas Eagle

The only unifying democrats want is, unified power to screw the people


6 posted on 05/29/2008 10:59:20 PM PDT by Nailbiter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: bpjam
Hey if Jim Webb can write some pedophilia laced porn novel, whats the big deal with ol’ Stuart Smalley coming up with some filth? Hypocritical dirt-bag perverts, the whole lot of 'em.
7 posted on 05/29/2008 11:00:10 PM PDT by loveitor.. ("I will leave with the greatest love for this country of ours..." Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: loveitor..

Yeah, I was about to say. Jim Webb is lower than pig vomit. His scribes were a cross between a very low-rent Nabokov and Larry Flynt’s Chester the Molestor.


8 posted on 05/29/2008 11:06:51 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (~"This is what happens when you find a stranger in the Alps !"~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY
Keith Ellison....also expressed concerns about the 2000 satirical article that Republicans began circulating last week. None of the critical House members called on Franken to step aside.

Again Keith Ellison fails as a muslim. First he doesn't insist on a fatwa on the evident apostate Obama, and now allows sexual license unfettered by Franken.

What kind of "religion" is this supposed to be, eh?

There, there. Good little muslim....

Ptuh!

9 posted on 05/29/2008 11:13:39 PM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

Playboy has articles?


10 posted on 05/29/2008 11:18:03 PM PDT by Gamecock (The question is not, Am I good enough to be a Christian? rather Am I good enough not to be?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: onedoug
"Again Keith Ellison fails as a muslim. First he doesn't insist on a fatwa on the evident apostate Obama, and now allows sexual license unfettered by Franken.
What kind of "religion" is this supposed to be, eh?"

One that will cheat and lie, do anything it needs to in order to destroy the infidels government and establish itself in it.

11 posted on 05/29/2008 11:20:42 PM PDT by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY
"I have to ask myself, can I explain it to my 11-year-old daughter? I'd have considerable difficulty," Ellison said

Yeah, Keith. I'm betting that's the only thing in Playboy you'd have to explain to your 11-year-old daughter.

12 posted on 05/29/2008 11:37:29 PM PDT by ReignOfError
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ReignOfError

Franken and Coleman matter not. Jesse “the Body” Ventura is on the precipice of jumping into this race and screwing it all up. Just watch, you’ll see.


13 posted on 05/30/2008 12:37:55 AM PDT by tenthirteen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY
At one point in the Playboy piece titled "Porn-O-Rama!" Franken called the Internet a "terrific learning tool," writing that his 12-year-old son was able to use it for a sixth-grade report on bestiality.

Like Franken himself, there is nothing remotely funny about this.

Franken was always sooooo overated.....

14 posted on 05/30/2008 1:09:33 AM PDT by happygrl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: happygrl

If Franken gets elected after writing that his 12-year-old son was able to use the internet for a sixth-grade report on bestiality, I’ll be shocked...


15 posted on 05/30/2008 1:37:54 AM PDT by Dr. Scarpetta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Gamecock
Playboy has articles?

I always thought that 'articles' was a code-word for those things on the girls' chests.

16 posted on 05/30/2008 2:07:48 AM PDT by Erasmus (Nihilism never amounted to anything.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Gamecock
"Playboy has articles?"

Franken's best defense may be that since absolutely no one read the article in the first place it was not really like "publishing" the piece - he might as well have imagined it all, except that he got paid and Playboy got to put his name in the table of contents. Don't know why anyone would want an article from Al Franken about anything, but then I've never appreciated his schtick anyway - that "Stuart Smalley" character was one of the more annoying things I've ever seen and not remotely funny.
17 posted on 05/30/2008 2:15:54 AM PDT by Enchante (Barack Chamberlain: My 1930s Appeasement Policy Goes Well With My 1960s Socialist Policies!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

Franken running for the Senate? Damn, if that doesn’t sound like an episode from “The Twilight Zone”. Pleez gimme a break!

He’s got a lot going for him, however. Like a burned-out career as a “comedian”(?), and major success at Air America. /s

Franken is very, very, intelligent. But, IMHO, he’s never been able to focus that intelligence into accomplishing anything important. Does that sound senatorial? ;)


18 posted on 05/30/2008 3:58:46 AM PDT by Randy Papadoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY
Senate candidate Al Franken's satirical and explicit take on virtual sex Considering he was a virtual comedienne, that makes sense.
19 posted on 05/30/2008 5:10:59 AM PDT by PghBaldy (Michelle O's handlers: "Get me white people...!!!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson