Posted on 06/12/2008 12:30:50 PM PDT by pissant
Daily Kos has obtained a copy of Obama's "certification of live birth."
All of the information is what we have been told before - name, birth date, etc.. His mother's race is listed as "Caucasian," his father as "African." No middle name of Muhammad, no first name of "Barry," no last name of "Dunham." He's listed as "Barack Hussein Obama II," not "Jr."
(Interestingly, in the lower right hand corner is the backwards reflection of a stamp, "June 6 or G, 2007". Did someone request or process this record about a year ago?)
Site creator Markos Moulitsas mentions in the comments the campaign released it to him.
(Also, for astrologers, the time of birth was 7:24 p.m.)
Next time you get one of those e-mails suggesting Obama has a different "real name," send people to this post or that document.
UPDATE: I'm getting some, "Jim, this looks modern," e-mail messages. As Ed notes,
When someone requests a validated copy of their birth certificate, they don’t get a photocopy of the original. They get a fresh certificate with a seal showing that it came from the official registrar, in most states. They keep the info in a computer and produced validated copies on request.
This is a validated copy of the birth certificate, with which Obama could get a passport, register to vote, etc etc. It’s perfectly acceptable.
Obama himself probably has a dog-eared yellowing copy in a desk drawer somewhere; this document is what he or someone authorized by him was given by the state out of its records. Barring some vast conspiracy within the Hawaii State Department of Health, there is no reason to think his birth certificate would have any different data.
From what I read on LGF...The O!bama campaign staff gave this to the “screw’em” Daily Kos. Shows you just what the O!messiah is all about. Frightening.
“someone inside the Dept of Vital Statistics in Hawaii was paid off to issue this or something along those lines”
That is possible. Hawaii is a Dim state. I bet there are lots of Rats working there, and not many Pubs to watch them.
Also, why isn’t Obama’s religion listed as Muslim?
Not true, depending on the circumstances.
If you magnify the image and look closely, the date is actually June 6, 2008. It looks like it's handwritten on the back. Not sure what the reason is for that.
This looks like, sorry to say, one of those certificates I get when my dogs hips and elbows have been tested. Only less information on it. There should be a seal somewhere and perhaps an address of the parents; etc. If she gave birth in a hospital; shouldn’t there be an attending physician’s signature too?
§338-17.7 Establishment of new certificates of birth, when. ...
(b) When a new certificate of birth is established under this section, it shall be substituted for the original certificate of birth. Thereafter, the original certificate and the evidence supporting the preparation of the new certificate shall be sealed and filed. Such sealed document shall be opened only by an order of a court of record.
Because the States don't put religion on the birth certificate. Some have other information, though - Vlad's North Carolina one includes my husband's and my State of birth and birth date.
Hey, I didn’t say anyone was paid off, just for the record. The way you quoted me suggests I am making that claim. Next time use quotes in context, ok?
Doesn’t look real.
Any Hawaiian Freepers have a birth certificate from the early 60’s that can be used as a comparison?
Hawaii does have a “republican” governor, although a Mainstreetish one.
No Hospital listed?
This document proves one thing. BHO is a bastard — in the technical sense.
Since his name is Barack Hussein Obama, II, rather than Jr., his parents were not married at the time of his birth.
I've never seen a U.S. birth certificate that lists religion. Nor should they. It's irrelevant to the purpose of a birth certificate.
But he was conceived after the Selma march in 1965, but time traveled to ‘61 for his birth. He is amazing
No watermark which shows up in a photocopied or scanned document such as this or a death cert...........Doesn’t mean anything, its just something I noticed. I might be wrong too......
I have never heard of that distinction before- where is it written that someone with a Roman Numeral in his name is illegimate?
Yeah. Here we go again!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.