To: Clint N. Suhks
I just don’t think that Jindal will be the difference between victory and defeat in 2008, and if he is part of a losing campaign (or even a winning campaign and a caretaker presidency) he may damage his future chances for the presidency down the road. Frankly, we can’t afford to waste his potential, IMO.
38 posted on
07/23/2008 8:28:01 AM PDT by
LWalk18
To: LWalk18
My personal issue now are the Supremes. McQueeg may not get who he nominates the first 10 times but whoever they may be will be 100% better than the “Ruth Buzzy Ginsberg” image that Obomba has promised to nominate.
39 posted on
07/23/2008 8:39:13 AM PDT by
Clint N. Suhks
(If McCain chose Gov Palin for VP would his campaign slogan be McCain/Palin and he can't get up!)
To: LWalk18
I’ll go with Tom “water-me-twice-per-week” Ridge. Why ruin a good person with the “Tin Man”. Let’s see who the other two losers will be running with these two losers.
47 posted on
07/23/2008 8:49:04 AM PDT by
Digger
(If RINO is your selection, then failure is your election)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson