Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

California secretly struggles with renewables
CFACT ^ | January 16th, 2021 | David Wojick

Posted on 01/17/2021 5:40:22 PM PST by george76

California has hooked up a grid battery system that is almost ten times bigger than the previous world record holder, but when it comes to making renewables reliable it is so small it might as well not exist.

The new battery array is rated at a storage capacity of 1,200 megawatt hours (MWh); easily eclipsing the record holding 129 MWh Australian system built by Tesla a few years ago. However, California peaks at a whopping 42,000 MW. If that happened on a hot, low wind night this supposedly big battery would keep the lights on for just 1.7 minutes (that’s 103 seconds). This is truly a trivial amount of storage.

Mind you this system is being built to serve just Pacific Gas & Electric. But they by coincidence peak at about half of California, or 21,000 MWh, so they get a magnificent 206 seconds of peak juice. Barely time to find the flashlight, right?

There is no word on what this trivial giant cost, since PG&E does not own it. That honor goes to an outfit called Vistra that does a lot of different things with electricity and gas. But these complex battery systems are not cheap.

This one reportedly utilizes more than 4,500 stacked battery racks, each of which contains 22 individual battery modules. That is 99,000 separate modules that have to be made to work well together. Imagine hooking up 99,000 electric cars and you begin to get the picture.

The US Energy Information Administration reports that grid scale battery systems have averaged around $1.5 million a MWh over100% renewable deception the last few years. At that price this trivial piece of storage cost just under TWO BILLION DOLLARS. At 103 seconds of peak storage that is about $18,000,000 a second. Money for nothing.

Mind you the PG&E engineers are not that stupid. They know perfectly well that this billion dollar battery is not there to provide backup power when wind and solar do not produce. In fact the truth is just the opposite. The battery’s job is to prevent wind and solar power from crashing the grid when they do produce.

It is called grid stabilization. Wind and solar are so erratic that it is very hard to maintain the constant 60 cycle AC frequency that all our wonderful electronic devices require. If the frequency gets more than just a tiny bit off the grid blacks out. Preventing these crashes requires active stabilization.

Grid instability due to erratic wind and solar used to not be a problem, because the huge spinning metal rotors in the coal, gas and nuclear power plant generators simply absorbed the fluctuations. But most of those plants have been shut down, so we need billion dollar batteries to do what those plants did for free. Nor is this monster battery the only one being built in California to try to make wind and solar power work. Many more are in the pipeline and not just in California. Many states are struggling with instability as baseline generators are switched off.

There is even an insane irony here, one that is perfect for Crazy California. This billion dollar battery occupies the old generator room of a shut down gas fired power plant. Those generators used to make the grid stable. Now we are struggling to do it.

Of course no one at PG&E or Vistra says publicly that this monster battery is there to keep renewables from trashing the grid, not to back them up. One wonders if the California Public Utilities Commission knows this? The big question is why is the rate paying public not told? Or the press? There is really a very expensive hoax here.

While on this topic, let’s ask what it would actually cost to back up wind and solar with batteries. This depends a lot on local climate. How often the wind does not blow hard for example. Wind generators need about 10 mph just to start and more like a sustained 30 mph for full power.

Multi-day heat waves are often periods of very low wind, combined with a maximum need for power. A nasty combination. So my rough rule of thumb is that you need storage of 7 days times peak need.

California peaks at 42,000 MWh and 7 days is 168 hours so using this rough rule we would need about 7 million MWh of batteries. This makes 1200 MWh truly trivial. Then at $1.5 million a MWh we get an astounding 10.5 TRILLION DOLLARS, just for the batteries to make renewables reliable.

The scam is breathtaking, and not just in California. Nationwide we are spending untold billions of dollars trying to keep the erratic nature of renewables from crashing the electric power system. But these efforts are routinely portrayed as storage for when renewables do not run. Stabilization is the opposite of storage. We are being lied to about renewables.


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: batterysystems; california; electricity; energy; globalwarming; renewables
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last
To: george76
10.5 TRILLION DOLLARS, just for the batteries to make renewables reliable

Mr. Biden to the rescue.

21 posted on 01/17/2021 6:43:18 PM PST by Jeff Chandler (We flattened the heck out of that curve, didn’t we?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler

Boondoggle Biden


22 posted on 01/17/2021 6:47:58 PM PST by butlerweave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: george76

Nuclear and natural gas, dummies.


23 posted on 01/17/2021 6:50:23 PM PST by beethovenfan (Mene, Mene, Tekel, Upharsin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: metmom

So not only is it going to be prohibitively expensive, but it will likely take more energy to produce than the amount of energy it does produce.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I’ve seen the numbers on the energy required to manufacture both solar panels and industrial wind turbines (IWTs).... I remember about 30 or 40 years ago, solar used to take about 25 years worth of electrical production to match what it took to make the solar panel. Those numbers have come down and I suspect that they are now in the 5 year range. Not sure what it is for IWTs.

However, there are many many other considerations of an environmental nature that make you go “huh?” and here are a few....

A 2 to 3 MW IWT has a concrete base under it of approximately 1,000 tons. For each ton of concrete produced, a ton of CO2 is released.... not a good thing for the global warmists out there.

Then there are the toxic wasteland in many locations where they are mining the rare earth magnets they need.... do an ixquick on ‘rare earth magnets toxic environment inner Mongolia Baotou China’ to see what a real toxic wasteland looks like.

Then there are the chemicals that get used to make solar panels..... here’s an article that talks about the chemicals in the panels themselves and this of course will be a future problem when all these old panels have to be disposed. https://sciencing.com/toxic-chemicals-solar-panels-18393.html

One of the biggest environmental issue with solar panels (if not the biggest) are the chemicals that get used in the manufacturing....here’s a good piece that talks about this. https://www.instituteforenergyresearch.org/uncategorized/will-solar-power-fault-next-environmental-crisis/ Here’s a quote from the piece that talks about the specific dangers of NF3...

According to federal data, however, building solar panels significantly increases emissions of nitrogen trifluoride (NF3), which is 17,200 times more potent than carbon dioxide as a greenhouse gas over a 100-year time period.[v] NF3 emissions increased by 1,057 percent over the last 25 years. In comparison, U.S. carbon dioxide emissions only increased by about 5 percent during that time period.


24 posted on 01/17/2021 6:55:14 PM PST by hecticskeptic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: metmom
how much energy it takes to produce these wind and solar sources and the batteries needed to store the energy.

Yup--particularly when the energy used to transport and store the products are included.

This is a massive long con.
25 posted on 01/17/2021 7:03:13 PM PST by cgbg (A kleptocracy--if they can keep it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: george76

Nothing a few more billions can’t perpetuate.


26 posted on 01/17/2021 7:10:06 PM PST by Organic Panic (Flinging poo is not a valid argument)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cgbg

“When your average leftist finds out that electricity does not grow on trees, it just crushes them!”

It does. Chop them down and burn them in a steam boiler. Or... Let them fall in a swamp and get covered up for a few millions years and we have beautiful clean abundant coal.


27 posted on 01/17/2021 7:11:22 PM PST by Organic Panic (Flinging poo is not a valid argument)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: algore

“pretty sure I read somewhere that all new residential construction in Cali had to have a solar system on the roof”

IIRC those solar panels on the roof feed into the grid, not the homeowners storage batteries. I don’t think the individual homeowners are allowed to have storage capabilities. Could be wrong, not sure.


28 posted on 01/17/2021 7:25:47 PM PST by oldvirginian (The glass is half empty because the damned thing is cracked and leaking. The 2020 election is proof.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: cgbg

We need more algae!


29 posted on 01/17/2021 7:48:47 PM PST by crusty old prospector
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: cgbg

haha! Well put! And let’s not forget Cali choking off our electricity on a whim in general. How’s a person to ‘refuel’ under THOSE conditions. Insanity!


30 posted on 01/17/2021 8:32:34 PM PST by GOP Poet (Super cool you can change your tag line EVERYTIME you post!! :D. (Small things make me happy))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: crusty old prospector

Powered directly by one of us SLAVES, pedaling like a hamster on crack.


31 posted on 01/17/2021 9:18:37 PM PST by 5th MEB (Progressives in the open; --- FIRE FOR EFFECT!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: oldvirginian

Yes, individual CA home owners are allowed to have storage.

Google: Powerwall.


32 posted on 01/17/2021 9:22:10 PM PST by Jeff Gordon (Don't pick a fight with an old man. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Gordon

Thanks. I stand corrected, been a while since I read anything about California.


33 posted on 01/17/2021 10:28:03 PM PST by oldvirginian (The glass is half empty because the damned thing is cracked and leaking. The 2020 election is proof.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: george76

Bookmark under more idiocies.


34 posted on 01/17/2021 10:36:11 PM PST by aquila48 (Do not let them make you care! Guilting you is how they control you. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hecticskeptic

Thanks for all the info.

I’m saving that for future use .


35 posted on 01/18/2021 1:06:22 AM PST by metmom (...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: algore

True. Effective this year.


36 posted on 01/18/2021 2:21:27 AM PST by Cobra64 (Common sense isn’t common anymore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: rey

Plus, all new homes in CA cannot use natural gas.


37 posted on 01/18/2021 4:30:26 AM PST by attiladhun2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

Send her an e-mail. She’s dumb enough to do it herself.

“In, like, solidarity, like!” What a ding-a-ling!


38 posted on 01/18/2021 7:34:19 AM PST by Diana in Wisconsin (I don't have 'Hobbies.' I'm developing a robust post-Apocalyptic skill set. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson