Va666ine for Covid-19(84)
Posted on 07/31/2023 3:46:12 AM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer
KEY POINTS:
* New Covid vaccines are coming to the U.S. this fall — but many Americans may not take them.
* Pfizer, Moderna and Novavax are slated to deliver new single-strain coronavirus shots targeting the omicron subvariant XBB.1.5 in September.
* Experts told CNBC that public health officials and providers could potentially increase uptake of the shots by communicating that they will likely become a routine part of health care moving forward.
(Excerpt) Read more at cnbc.com ...
Good luck, dude. Hope you find a good woman.
Watch Bill Gates openly discuss his alignment with the goal of reducing the world population by 10-15% using "vaccines" in part to do it:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DeHLNthYTSI
The whole clip is worth watching but you can watch him clearly say it at 1:26. He doesn't hide it at all.
It's not a coincidence that Bill Gates had such ties to Jeffrey Epstein.
Because the excess death rate is not yet high enough to keep Social Security and Medicare solvent.
And what do you believe?
Why should there be any trust?
The government, along with the supportive media and educational institutions, have only been lying to us now for sixty or so years. After a while (a short while), they were not able to keep the lies straight any longer. So, they were slowly being exposed.
That's where we are today, and lies (propaganda) are still the single most effective tool they use for controlling the masses.
Don't expect it to change any time soon.
All for a virus that has a 99.94% overall survival rate. The vast majority of peeps do not need the vaccine, and it’s debatable that even those with 4 or more comorbidities need the vaccine as there hasn’t really been any pub,ished results that show that the vaccines helped that group to an appreciable %. (If someone has a study result showing that the vaccine helped substantially, I’d appreciate a post, but last I read, it didn’t even help more than 11% of those with comorbidities survive the virus)
This is a generic comment with the frame being how assertions are so often made and not sourced in some threads. It seems that so many assert without citation, and when questioned, assert more and further but again without citation.
The little game of "Google" this and that will turn up competing views about many things, so deeper dives are sometimes warranted, and seldom done.
In the case of this thread, "anti-vaxxer" is that language trick of wrapping all together, whereas one can be for other vaccines and energetically against the "novel" mRNA gene therapy but be painted with one, broad brush.
T.B. Yoits wrote:
The CDC knew it wasn’t a vaccine which is why they had to change their definition.
T.B. Yoits wrote: “Watch Bill Gates openly discuss his alignment with the goal of reducing the world population by 10-15% using “vaccines” in part to do it:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DeHLNthYTSI
I’ve watched that multiple times and Gates is clearly stating that if vaccines can be used to reduce childhood mortality in the poorest countries then there will be less pressure on parents in those countries to have large families.
Here’s the actual quote: “First, we’ve got population,” he said during the talk organized by TED, a non-profit organization devoted to spreading ideas. “The world today has 6.8 billion people. That’s headed up to about nine billion. Now, if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that by, perhaps, 10 or 15 percent. But there, we see an increase of about 1.3.”
No where does he say we need to deploy vaccines to kill people.
Nuremburg Trials 2 is what should be coming in a sane world.
T.B. Yoits wrote: “The CDC knew it wasn’t a vaccine which is why they had to change their definition.”
What is your issue with this definition: “Vaccine: A preparation that is used to stimulate the body’s immune response against diseases. Vaccines are usually administered through needle injections, but some can be administered by mouth or sprayed into the nose.”
Fixed it.
“Good luck, dude. Hope you find a good woman.”
Been married 33 years to the same wonderful woman. When COVID hit, she wouldn’t take no for an answer when I didn’t want the jab. Unfortunately I needed surgery and the hospital said I needed to be vaccinated before they would do anything. So I did. I got COVID several months later and my wife did nothing but yell at me because I didn’t take the booster. So I did. At that point I said no more.
When subsequent jabs came out, she got them and I said no. Led to some fights. Then after her entire family took additional jabs and got COVID, there was no further conversation. I’m not expecting a fight this time around, but if there is one, as much as I love my wife, I’m moving to a part of the world where I can lay on a beach and enjoy retirement.
vivenne wrote: “And what do you believe?”
I believe you can’t name two or three policies of RFK, other than his anti-vaxxers stance, that you find attractive.
Fauci needs to be in prison! .... imho
Yep, one target
Such is the level of discussion. As to Gates and those who wish to involve what he said or did not say....
"Bill Gates says China ‘did a lot of things right’ with coronavirus response"One can play many different games to point a discussion or debate into some other "into the weeds" direction.
By Jackie Salo
Source: https://nypost.com/2020/04/27/bill-gates-defends-chinas-response-to-coronavirus/"What followed was a steady, almost inexorable shift in power from the overwhelmed governments to a group of non-governmental organizations, according to a seven-month investigation by POLITICO journalists based in the U.S. and Europe and the German newspaper WELT. Armed with expertise, bolstered by contacts at the highest levels of Western nations and empowered by well-grooved relationships with drug makers, the four organizations took on roles often played by governments — but without the accountability of governments."
"How Bill Gates and partners used their clout to control the global Covid response — with little oversight"
By ERIN BANCO, ASHLEIGH FURLONG and LENNART PFAHLER, Politico, 09/14/2022
Source: https://www.politico.com/news/2022/09/14/global-covid-pandemic-response-bill-gates-partners-00053969
This thread began with "New Covid vaccines are coming to the U.S. this fall." The hand-wringing from CNBC is that "uptake" will be low.
Translation: a public might not "buy" the new products, in ways and responses similar to the EVs filling showrooms because of a lack of "uptake."
I think people are becoming "quick on the uptake" that the whole Covid-19 -- the "19" disappearing from the media prose -- is quite well responded to by being "slow on the uptake of continuing injections," or, as other rhetoric has been floated, "vaccine hesitant."
By that, mRNA-products hesitant. Some will not participate in buying the next products. It is their right in a free society.
Let us pray and encourage all of the liberals to hurry up and get triple vac with them.
Same here...great job by pharma
Done with it. Took the first booster in Dec of 2021. Four days later I got what I assume is one of the reactions. My tongue itched. Still does every once in awhile. Got Covid in April of 22. Figure I might still have some antibodies in my system.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.