Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/08/2024 10:56:40 PM PDT by knighthawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: knighthawk

bttt


2 posted on 05/08/2024 11:31:34 PM PDT by Pajamajan (Pray for our nation. Never be a peaceful slave in a new Socialist America..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk

I would LOOOOOOVEEEE to see that Crazed Lunatic Judge is SOME KIND OF TROUBLE.


3 posted on 05/08/2024 11:35:14 PM PDT by Maris Crane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk

tHIS jUDGE IS A CALIFORNIA FRUIT CAKE.


4 posted on 05/08/2024 11:39:30 PM PDT by Maris Crane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk

Judges and DA’s are crashing and burning everywhere


5 posted on 05/08/2024 11:45:51 PM PDT by Zack Attack (✔)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk

Bailey previously represented plaintiffs suing the developers of one of Trump’s hotel condominiums:


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adam_Leitman_Bailey

Trump SoHo New York[14] is a $450 million hotel condominium. In February 2011, several prospective buyers of condominiums in the building, including French soccer star Olivier Dacourt, sued the developers in federal court, claiming that they had been tricked into buying the condos by the “deceptive” sales figures, and that the number of apartments sold at Trump Soho had been “fraudulently misrepresented.” The plaintiffs were represented by Bailey. The suit was settled with plaintiffs recovering 90 per cent of their deposits.[15][16] Several years later, the case was described as “a watershed case in the world of condo litigation ... [C]ondo attorneys said that developers are now far more reluctant to disclose sales information to buyers’ attorneys, for fear of legal repercussions if they turn out to be wrong.”[17]


6 posted on 05/08/2024 11:59:03 PM PDT by Fedora
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk

Look how a lawyer and judge interact about an ongoing case. They both know the law, yet they “talk” around the borders and say it was nothing. Very high profile, news worthy case and this is how they act? What do these people do with normal, everyday cases? The whole façade is gone……


7 posted on 05/09/2024 12:58:20 AM PDT by Lockbox (politicians, they all seemed like game show hosts to me.... Sting…)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk

later


10 posted on 05/09/2024 3:29:58 AM PDT by Gay State Conservative (Proudly Clinging To My Guns And My Religion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk
Engoron ordered former President Donald Trump in March to pay a $454 million judgement after 30 lenders turned him away.

The lenders turned him away (if that's even true) not because they don't trust Trump, but because they are afraid of the corrupt legal system coming down hard on them. This is how swamp lawfare works.

12 posted on 05/09/2024 3:58:33 AM PDT by Fresh Wind (Nothing says "Democracy" like throwing your opponents in jail.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk

Arthur Engoron and Adam Leitman Bailey. I guess we are not supposed to notice…


13 posted on 05/09/2024 4:13:28 AM PDT by thegagline (Sic semper tyrannis! Goldwater & Thomas Sowell in 2024)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk

This doesn’t make sense to me. The basis of the complaint is that it was an ex-parte communication, but the Judge didn’t solicit advice, and the advice he received was the opposite of what he did.

This is very thin gruel.


14 posted on 05/09/2024 4:18:11 AM PDT by Fido969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk
Um... "A well known New York City real estate lawyer has reportedly prompted the state of New York to investigate Judge Arthur Engeron after he claimed to have given the judge unsolicited advice"

Engeron should be disbarred for what he did to Trump, but that statement is stupid.

This guy claims he called and gave him advice (not asked -for) so he should be investigated? Ridiculous. So ridiculous it makes me wonder if it's a 'setup' to later get them to dismiss the charge, and say "See? Erigeron is 'exonerated'"

15 posted on 05/09/2024 4:21:59 AM PDT by Mr. K (No consequence of repealing Obamacare is worse than Obamacare)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk

Makes no sense.. I gave the judge unsolicited advice?


16 posted on 05/09/2024 4:31:07 AM PDT by maddog55 (The only thing systemic in America is the left's hatred of it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk
Hmmm...

Very, very clever lawyer. Brilliant.

Gotta wonder how they're going to get James in NY state now...


19 posted on 05/09/2024 5:34:34 AM PDT by logi_cal869 (-cynicus the "concern troll" a/o 10/03/2018 /!i!! &@$%&*(@ -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk

yes, sounds flimsy, but the judicial code states clearly that judges are not to receive advise from anyone regarding a case.

They claim “this Trump case” was not specifically discussed, but it’s clear their “general” discussion applied to Trump’s case. It’s a violation and should be considered.

The judicial review board can kill him, or excuse him, based on whether they like him, or hate him. They may be looking for a reason to dump a judge who’s embarrassing their courts now, past or future. NYC justice.


20 posted on 05/09/2024 5:58:34 AM PDT by chiller (Davey Crockett said: "Be sure you're right. Then go ahead'. I'll go ahead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson