Posted on 05/15/2024 9:00:29 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
When Hunter Biden's laptop, with all its crazy photographs and incriminating emails, came to light before the 2020 presidential election, the media colluded to ignore the story completely, dubbing the laptop Russian disinformation. If you dared to speak of it on social media, you were lucky if your posts would just be suppressed or censored instead of having your account disabled.
The laptop was, of course, completely genuine, and the mainstream media conveniently (and quietly) only admitted so after the election.
Another incriminating Biden family artifact that was made public during the campaign was the Ashley Biden diary, which, like the Hunter Biden laptop, was immediately dismissed by the media and fact-checking websites as unproven. Project Veritas had purchased the diary but chose not to publish it because they couldn't authenticate it. It was arguably the correct call, though when the site National File published it, many were convinced it was, indeed authentic. However, the diary was absent from the conversation because the media wouldn't talk about it.
Well, like the laptop before it, the diary has now been authenticated. Not only that, it's been authenticated by none other than Ashley Biden herself, and the left-wing fact-checking website Snopes, which originally dismissed the diary as "unproven," quietly changed its rating to "True."
On April 29, 2024, Snopes changed the rating of this fact check from "Unproven" to "True" based on testimony provided by Ashley Biden. In an April 8 letter to a New York judge requesting jail time for one of the two people convicted of stealing her diary, Biden wrote, "I will forever have to deal with the fact that my personal journal can be viewed online."
(Excerpt) Read more at pjmedia.com ...
As father to two now grown girls I bathed with them as toddlers
But showers your genitalia is eye level to them
Not for me
Plus she indicates she was considerably older
Did you even read what I said?
Obviously when they’re older its a problem. I said that exactly because of how old Bidens daughter would have been.
I also think it can’t be just one parent bathing with a little kid, unless they’re the same sex. I think just to keep it a more typical thing, both mom and dad would do so on a normal basis, so it wouldn’t exclusively be with just the opposite sex parent.
And the delegates are bound to Biden on the first Ballot. If he doesn’t drop out they can’t replace him
There’s lots of folks that have expected politicians and the media to be honest and fair minded. Just another delusion of our current society.
There's no Black tranny named "Michelle" with a penis poking through its dress who hasn't been mistaken for being a woman.
Sorry, but MEN DON’T SHOWER WITH LITTLE DAUGHTERS.......UNLESS THEY ARE PERVERTS!
Is Snopes pretty reliable?
Snopes is irrelevant; Ashley Biden wrote a victim impact letter pleading for a harsh sentence for the woman who “stole” her diary. probably the greater scandal here is how the DOJ covered up, federalized the case and went after the so called perp.
“ Snopes is irrelevant; Ashley Biden wrote a victim impact letter pleading for a harsh sentence for the woman who “stole” her diary. probably the greater scandal here is how the DOJ covered up, federalized the case and went after the so called perp”
BTTT
PTSD blocks memories, you know…or can.
While Jill, on the other hand, loves it, and will do everything in her power to give Joe, and her, a shot at being there another four.
RE: Is Snopes pretty reliable?
For me , Snopes is considered a generally reliable fact-checking site. Here’s a breakdown of what I personally think:
Pros:
Long history: Founded in 1994, it’s one of the oldest and most established fact-checking websites.
Transparency: They cite their sources and allow readers to do their own research and think critically.
Cons:
Potential bias: Some critics claim a liberal bias, though Snopes maintains neutrality.
Rating variations: Their ratings may differ slightly from other fact-checkers due to timing or emphasis.
It’s a good idea to Look for the date of the fact check. Information can change over time.
Consider the evidence they present and see if it seems credible.
If I’m skeptical, I’d Consult other well-regarded fact-checking sites for a wider perspective.
Overall, Snopes is a valuable resource for evaluating information, but it’s always a good idea to be a critical consumer of information and consider multiple sources.
She must be referring to Bill Clinton
“Being turned on when I wasn’t supposed to be.” If your child is old enough to take a shower rather than being bathed, she is old enough to have sexual privacy from the opposite sex. “Hypersexualization” is a psychiatric term that professionals once understood; but since psychiatry has been polluted and politicized, we don’t know about these things any more.
I agree. Have two daughters and when bathing them as toddlers, it never once occurred to me to join the bath. I don’t think this something any normal father would actually do or want to do. If this offends someone, then you might just be a perv.
Would argue that Biden has NOT DONE ANYTHING APPROPRIATE since about age 9
Someone else described them much better, though I forget where I saw it.
Snopes, like Wikipedia or other far-left sites, if fine for general information and non-controversial stuff. But if it’s political or controversial in any way, they’ve got a hard-Commie slant to all of it.
She has lied all her life, as has Barack.
Let’s hope for our nation’s sake that she is not lying about this.
Key factor people cite is her laziness and disinterest in the affairs of the country. She wants the humble peasants to serve her and applaud her on book signings or women’s TV panels and then to just get out of her life.
Ha. Good post. All true.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.