I've never seen a more graphic demonstration that creationists don't themselves even read the unformatted glop they cut and paste onto this forum. The following comes from your own solid slab of hocus-pocus gibberish in post 168:
7) Some scientists worry that there may be yet other explanations for the red shift and that too much reliance may have been placed on Hubble's Law. Halton Arp, an American astronomer based in Germany, has collected "discrepant" red shifts which appear to be in conflict with traditional views.You don't understand your own arguments, not having written or even read them, so no wonder my responses to them puzzle you. And don't try to tell me I said "Alton Harp" instead of "Halton Arp," either.
I didn't bother reading your rehashing of digestion REALLY being an atomic process. I'm not interested in word games.
Chemical processes are governed by electons and should have been fast in the early universe according to CDK. CDKers admit that much. They claim that weaker chemical bonds (caused by faster-flying, low-mass electrons) are good for you. Hah!
My point is that aging is more a matter of chemistry than it is of large-scale mechanics. Glucose molecules bind across your protein fibers, making your tissues more brittle. That sort of thing. No CDKer has attempted a coherent and credible model of biological processes in a light-speeded world, so it's just another area where all I get for answers is mumbling and arm-waving.
Bottom line there is that you can't go back 6000 years to see how things were then since they were not the same.
I have no use for a cosmology that won't even try to go back 6000 years. The CDK model does try to go back and say how things were, and the model doesn't work. Not my problem.
The Second Law of Thermodynamics refers to quantifiable thermodynamic processes. This law so far appears inviolable. The claim that "order" never arises "spontaneously" from "disorder" stands apart from the Second Law of Thermodynamics because 1) it's not about heat, 2) it's not quantifiable, 3) it's demonstrably false.
For instance, when the universe emitted the flash of light we see as the Cosmic Microwave Background, there were only a few kinds of atoms, mostly hydrogen, helium, and a little lithium, and they were very evenly dispersed.
Since then, much of the universe's mass has clumped gravitationally in a perfectly lawful manner. Stars and galaxies formed. Heavier elements were forged in stars and dispersed through space in supernovae.
In a perfectly lawful fashion we went from a universe that contained virtually no information to the one we see now. No violation of the Second Law of Thermodynamics was necessary, since the almost-but-not-perfectly evenly dispersed hydrogen of that early CMB universe contained enough 1) gravitational potential, and 2) nuclear energy potential to power the changes. The laws of physics and the passage of time did the rest.