To: tkmorris
Actually, after the election last year, and the one before that which elected Clinton for the second time, I would have gladly given up my right to vote if that meant that all those soccer moms and union govt employees who love that creep so much weren't allowed to vote either. My loss would have been the loss for a lot of folks who screwed things up. Men are more often conservative and vote republican anyway. So, yes, I have thought about it a lot. It was by God's grace that we have Bush in the WH right now. It probably would have been a landslide if the women had been removed from the picture. Who knows?
To: TheLionessRN
Let's face the fact that women because of their maternal instincts are attracted to different issues than men. They are more security concious which makes them more susceptible to arguments for bigger government. They are more attracted to eye appeal images than men which helped Willie immensely.
They do have it over men in the area of pragmatism which can be good or bad. They are reluctant to fly off in war driven adventures of foreign policy because of protecting their children which is good. They are hell to live with but hell to live without. Seems to me, women suffrage is about a draw. Men have done a pretty good job of messing this country up.
6 posted on
10/07/2001 3:29:46 AM PDT by
meenie
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson