We are tied to the UN, now our protector, because we do not have the military strength to go it alone by ourselves, the Dems to stingy to provide for entitlements, the Pubs too stingy to force businesses and tax payers to cough up the money for strong armed force. On top of that we have feminists and humanists who put human life above liberty and make us so scared of pouring blood and collateral damages that we end up prefering bowing to communist thugs and criminals at the UN rather than slit the throats of a good 2 billion souls feeding the scaries scums of the Earth of China, Russia, North´Korea, Cuba, the Middle East et al.
Considering that now the little "Somalies" have been able to flatten the fatso wall streeter at the WTC, I am wondering who is better off.
We have to admit that every one is on the left in the US save for a few individuals of the armed forces. Even so called conservative business men would like to do business without having to carry a firearm or forcing employees to pledge to the flag. The Dems are on welfar pay check mode, the Pubs and the dems are both on army welfare protection mode, with the sole and sad difference that the tax payers are given more respects at times when they get flattened at the WTC than when our service men get whacked in the USS Cole.
Somehow this is going to have to change, because I do not like the idea of building coalitions because we do not have the military strength to go it alone, requesting welfare protection benefits from a bunch of psychopaths in Syria or SOmalia, so that we can keep doing business and the airlines can keep flying.