After reading that, and giving the background of it to the context of your later arguements, I must still disagree with the import of the legal aspects of the recordings but certainly take back my criticism of your post as supporting the Past-Perpetrator-in-Chief. You have my apology for a too-hasty flame.....
those damn Clinton's make my blood boil and always will...thereby making my eyes sometimes cloud over when I think I see any in their camp....
Freep On