It follows that transformation of the social environment must become their political objective. In this are the seeds of a monstrous tyranny because the only agency with the power to reach to the heart of civil society in a program of manipulation and social engineering is the state.
Brilliant stuff.
1 posted on
12/11/2001 6:50:52 AM PST by
dead
To: dead
Bookmarked.
2 posted on
12/11/2001 6:57:20 AM PST by
Neets
To: dead
Demands for state-subsidised child care were rapidly and extensively met. Pensions for sole parents (of whom about 90 per cent were women) removed responsibility from fathers and transferred it to the state (ie, the taxpayer). Men have voted for this stuff too.
To: dead
A state legislator, here in Vermont, proposed mandatory state sanctioned child care for every child. Mothers would no longer be able to care for children in their own homes. Fortunately, this guy was a lone nut and the idea went nowhere. It does indicate, however, how the left views the role of the state and the role of the family.
To: dead
Well, the other leg os the societal engineering methodology is working just fine. Seral killing as enlightened social policy is chalking up roughly 1.3 million solutions per year in America and the femifascists are now exporting the slaughter to other countries. What an enlightened scab on humanity's but these sexist beast are! They're working so hard to heal the organism, don'tcha think? [/sarcasm]
6 posted on
12/11/2001 7:04:33 AM PST by
MHGinTN
To: dead
It follows that transformation of the social environment must become their political objective. In this are the seeds of a monstrous tyranny because the only agency with the power to reach to the heart of civil society in a program of manipulation and social engineering is the state. Not necessarily the state. I disagree. An anarchic rule of democracy would just be enough to have these bolshevics even do that while the state sits powerless, burried under the PC burqua. Terrorism with suicide bombers or via democracy is illegal. Femi-Nazis campaigning for this terrorism in the US should be just as illegal as muslim terror fronts.
7 posted on
12/11/2001 7:05:48 AM PST by
lavaroise
To: dead
Thank you for the post.
It took me many months of agony to leave my mega-career to become a stay-at-home mom. After it was said and done, it took me seconds to realize my family and I have our lives back.
I can't believe I was influenced by them. That will NEVER happen again.
9 posted on
12/11/2001 7:25:44 AM PST by
lizma
To: dead
But the final irony is that feminist success has emancipated more men than women from family responsibilities. Men are freer, if not happierI have always said that Feminism was the greatest fraud ever perpetrated on Women, by Men. It allows guys to get laid, basically, for free! No responsibility, no guilt, no problems..
10 posted on
12/11/2001 7:50:33 AM PST by
Paradox
To: dead
As many women are coming to realise, the core proposition of gender feminism is that the institution of motherhood is the root cause of the oppression of women. Feminazi BUMP
To: dead
So the Aussies are having the same problem as the US.
To: dead
"Attachment Disorder" is now a common finding with children. They lack a trustworthy single caregiver.They are 'cared for' by a variety of nannies and minimun wage childcare workers. They are not beloved children they are just one of the crowd.
They never learn how to have a loving ,trusting relationship with one person.
We see that exibited in small children with overly aggressive behavior. there is no adult to protect them or ,see to it their needs are met. they need to compete for the attention of the paid help.
These kids grow up with anti social personality disorders.
They are the Johnny Walkers and gang members and high school shooters that need something to belong to.
The woman's movement has ruined a couple of generations of children. We now have young woman that do not know how to parent. it sad.....no it is a crime!
24 posted on
12/29/2001 3:29:02 PM PST by
RnMomof7
To: dead
There is a little light in this darkness.
My sister is raising two very polite and wholesome children who are not confused about the boy-girl roles.
I suspect there are other good families out there.
35 posted on
12/29/2001 3:46:19 PM PST by
LibKill
To: dead
"But the final irony is that feminist success has emancipated more men than women from family responsibilities. Men are freer, if not happier. In the end, the main casualties of gender feminism have been the children who don't see their fathers - and less of their mothers." I was with him until he hung this matza ball out there with no corroborating statements or citations. Despite all the evils he attributed to gender feminism, he had to PC up his thesis to portray men as partying their lives away at the expense of women and kids. I mean... he states that children suffer by not "seeing" their fathers, implying that fathers could care less. This is a very typical feminist viewpoint, probably inserted so that his feminist editor would let it go to print.
This is what passes for anti-feminist pro-male writing in the mainstream press. I categorically reject it as a feminist censored sop by a liberal rag to a declining readership who's sick of their liberal slant and abandoning them in droves.
To: dead
bttt
To: dead;khepera
There are two kinds of feminism: "liberal" or equal opportunity feminism, and gender feminism. Feminism: to gain total dominant control over men. Man bashing and pure hatred of all men in the name of equality.
Look at what feminism has done to America the land of the free woman, and the immoral deviates (former name, men). Maybe it's not fair to blame women, but the timing of the feminist movement and the decline in our society are in perfect sync.
57 posted on
01/04/2002 5:47:37 AM PST by
wwjdn
To: dead;wwjdn;woahhs;paul atreides;harrison bergeron
Which brings us to the essential thesis of gender feminism. This is that biological differences between the sexes are of no significance in shaping the behaviour of men and women. "Gender" is entirely a social and political construct fashioned by men as an instrument with which to segregate, disenfranchise, and oppress women.This definition is exactly half true. The here-unspoken half is that gender-feminists are perfectly willing to claim biologically-based female superiority, AND THEY DO, where it advantages them. That half is not referred to here, and it is the key half. Miss this half, lose to them, much as society has for 30+ years.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson