Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Quila
In the peer-review community, anyone who had scientific evidence criticizing evolution would be laughed out of that career. Evolutionists are not interested in science. They are interested in an agenda.
307 posted on 01/24/2002 4:41:19 PM PST by rwfromkansas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: rwfromkansas
In the peer-review community, anyone who had scientific evidence criticizing evolution would be laughed out of that career. Evolutionists are not interested in science. They are interested in an agenda.

Did you ever think of the real reason these people are laughed at? The theory of evolution is so strong that papers blatantly challenging the foundations of evolution are usually quite laughable. Now take something like cosmology for instance, one person recently submitted a paper claiming there may be no black holes. This was a serious challenge to cosmology theory as we know it. Because his paper was intelligent and made a lot of good scientific points supporting his idea, it is being quite well received. If someone comes up with something as equally academically valid against evolution, it would have to be accepted also.

Think of it this way. I'd get laughed right out of the house too if I went to a meeting of theologians with a big paper claiming Christ was gay (I've seen these papers, they are stupid).

323 posted on 01/25/2002 3:26:42 AM PST by Quila
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 307 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson