My post was clear in responding to YOUR question. -- And I asked you some in return.
-- You can't, - or won't reply? - So be it.
Huh?
Could you clarify exactly what you think I am leaving out?
Really, I'd like to know. Perhaps I'm inadvertently not communicating. I am attacking Dawkins for being an inconsistent nihilist, who is killing his own cause by his silly insistence that there is no good or evil in the universe.
What are you doing?