Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

WHY LEGALIZE MARIJUANA?
Voy forum ^ | 2-19-2 | Marc-Boris St-Maurice

Posted on 02/20/2002 6:08:45 AM PST by Magician

My first reaction is WHY NOT?

It’s a question of common sense.

Our marijuana laws do not work. They never have, and they never will.

Their stated goal being to rid society of the so-called affliction of marijuana use, the harsh reality is that since prohibition, usage rates have increased drastically.

Either we legalize it, and fast, or we get busy locking up millions of Canadians. With one out of three Canadians admitting to having tried marijuana, we may very well be locking up our best and brightest, not ruined by drugs, but ruined by the criminal sanctions that go with getting caught for what amounts to a common social practice. I can’t even begin to count how many elected officials admitted to having used it, yet everyday hundreds of average citizens are arrested for marijuana offences.

So, why are there so many users, and why is marijuana so easy to acquire?

In a strange twist, prohibition is to blame.

When a product is illegal, the profit margin skyrockets. Prohibition turns an agricultural product (a plant that’s very easy to grow) into a drug worth its weight in gold. Without prohibition, marijuana would cost pennies to produce. No wonder some adventurous modern day prospectors are setting up in their own back yards and basements to try and get in on the gold rush. Who could blame them? They aren’t hurting anyone, they’re making good money, and most of all customers are willing, grateful participants in the process.

We must come to grips with the fact that the demand for marijuana is never going away and find a better way of dealing with it. Imagine the billions of dollars spent on marijuana and enforcement going to more noble causes like health care and other social programs.

The general public understands this. Support for legalizing marijuana recently reached the much sought after 50%+1 majority. Recent polls show that 51% of Canadians support legalizing marijuana, a slim, but very real majority.

And with more and more advocates, the trend is just taking off. Several European countries like Belgium, Switzerland, Holland and Germany are successfully leading the way towards tolerance with legislation aimed at helping drugs users, not by treating them as criminals, but as human beings deserving of respect. There is no reason why Canada should lag behind. We should be on the cutting edge of this new international movement.

Now it is time to step onto the world stage and assert our sovereignty by legalizing marijuana once and for all. I would venture a friendly wager that the international community would stand by Canada on this issue. Our inevitable success would then make us a world leader in marijuana reform—an example for others to follow.

(I can hear it already): But marijuana is dangerous!

For the record, marijuana is NOT dangerous. It is no worse than coffee and much safer than alcohol. Marijuana is also much less addictive then cigarettes. Chronic use is rare as the majority do not smoke it everyday. Try that with tobacco!

What little risks that may be present with marijuana are no worse then any other risks deemed "morally acceptable". Should we ban music because, if played too loud it might hurt your hearing?

French fries and gravy are far more dangerous for our health then marijuana. Should we ban fast food and send overeaters to mandatory fitness camps?

Who are we, as a society to judge? What exactly are marijuana users guilty of? Who are they hurting? What have they done wrong?

To deny marijuana users the right to choose what they want to consume is nothing more than an arbitrary decision based on moral values, not public interest......

Legalization does not mean promoting use. It means providing medical care, support, education, quality standards and proper labeling. We then trust that responsible adults will make their own choices. This is what makes legalization healthy for our society. At least legalization would force retailers to be accountable for what they sell.

Under prohibition, the government has waived its responsibility for the well being of marijuana users, and is only responsible for their arrest and persecution.

This total disregard for their rights drives a wedge between them and the rest of society and breeds contempt for our legal institutions. If society does not tolerate pot smokers, how are pot smokers supposed to tolerate society? This does not make for a healthy social climate and even less a basis for sound policy.

If a policy so deeply flawed as prohibition not only fails to reach its goals, but actually makes the situation worse, it should be radically changed.

Prohibition is the problem, and legalization the solution.

In places where marijuana is tolerated use actually decreases.

Of course, don’t count on the politicians to have the courage to change the law—it’s not in their nature. Look instead to the Supreme Court. That is where most significant legal change comes from anyway. Gay rights and abortion issues were resolved there, and, some time this year our land’s highest court will also rule on the constitutionality of marijuana prohibition. I strongly urge government to make a wise decision and end this madness now. Millions of bright, productive, patriotic pot-smoking Canadians are counting on it.

Most sincerely, Marc-Boris St-Maurice Le Parti Marijuana


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 761-765 next last
To: Nate505
You are assuming that the government would allow more than 1 strain to be purchaced.
201 posted on 02/20/2002 11:24:39 AM PST by HRC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: ThomasJefferson
Dane will have to come up with a Clintonesque: "I sold, but I didn't 'deal.'" kind of statement. ANyone who was a serious enough user to have it become a "problem" surely sold on occation.

Or he could just be making it all up.

202 posted on 02/20/2002 11:26:45 AM PST by eno_
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 195 | View Replies]

To: sharktrager
If you want to go on anecdotal evidence, I know several people who would be wake and bakes in college but now don't even touch the stuff. Nothing has changed but those people's ages and responsibilities.
203 posted on 02/20/2002 11:28:38 AM PST by HRC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: eno_
Why not? It would be another source of money for capitalist companies who can make a buck off it. I would be surprised if there were not several large tobacco companies who would give up the evil weed for the good weed entirely.
204 posted on 02/20/2002 11:30:33 AM PST by HRC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: txculprit
I've yet to see and drug hegemonists in Gen X or later.

Our generation's job is unscrewing the country after the Boomers get through screwing it.

205 posted on 02/20/2002 11:30:58 AM PST by Hemingway's Ghost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies]

To: eno_
He probably won't answer at all, he has trying to evade. It shows cowardice in addition to his other moral failings. All this from the guy who has been lecturing everyone for three or four years about the evils of drug usage. This kind of person induces vomiting.
206 posted on 02/20/2002 11:33:01 AM PST by Protagoras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 202 | View Replies]

To: Dane
Answer #195, Clinton.
207 posted on 02/20/2002 11:34:23 AM PST by Protagoras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 200 | View Replies]

To: angry beaver norbert
Negative side effects of smoking. You can not say that smoking anything, is good for your health. The only way to completely minimize the negative effects is to injest THC directly skipping the smoking completely.
208 posted on 02/20/2002 11:34:28 AM PST by HRC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 181 | View Replies]

To: eno_
ANyone who was a serious enough user to have it become a "problem" surely sold on occation.

That is precisely correct.

209 posted on 02/20/2002 11:35:35 AM PST by Protagoras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 202 | View Replies]

To: ThomasJefferson
Dont forget the Democratic party.
210 posted on 02/20/2002 11:36:09 AM PST by HRC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: ThomasJefferson
. This kind of person induces vomiting.

ROFL. Sort of the "ipecac syrup" of the forum . Hilarious.

211 posted on 02/20/2002 11:36:14 AM PST by AUgrad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 206 | View Replies]

To: HRC
Why not indeed. It's just that some people are skittish about commercialization. And there are some precedents: In some European countries, wine production is heavily regulated and taxed, except at wine taverns on a vinyard property. Pot commerce could be kept similarly low key. Besides which, being a Federalist, I would allow states and localities to continue to make selling pot illegal.

I am sure some people though the end of Prohibition would be the end of the world, too.

212 posted on 02/20/2002 11:37:43 AM PST by eno_
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies]

To: OBAFGKM
No you won't. You can buy tobacco seed from any decent seed catalog. I grow it all the time - to ATTRACT bugs!!!!
213 posted on 02/20/2002 11:38:02 AM PST by KeepUSfree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: ThomasJefferson
Answer #195, Clinton.

LOL! You already answred your own question with your reply #195.

214 posted on 02/20/2002 11:39:00 AM PST by Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 207 | View Replies]

To: ThomasJefferson; _eno
ANyone who was a serious enough user to have it become a "problem" surely sold on occation.(eno)

That is precisely correct.(ThomasJefferson)

LOL! I am watching a Libertaian "Miss Cleo" session in progress.

You two, keep on going, this is great.

215 posted on 02/20/2002 11:43:20 AM PST by Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 209 | View Replies]

To: AUgrad
ROFL. Sort of the "ipecac syrup" of the forum . Hilarious.

Dammit! You stole my line, I was going to go back and change it to "no need for ipecac syrup with people like you around". But I figured this goof wouldn't know about legal drugs that make you puke. :-)

216 posted on 02/20/2002 11:43:54 AM PST by Protagoras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 211 | View Replies]

To: HRC
You are assuming that the government would allow more than 1 strain to be purchaced.

Why wouldn't they? I can go buy a pack of Marlboro's, Camels, Winstons, Pall Malls, Kools, Newports, Benson and Hedges, and a countless amount of genaric packs of cigs at a time, as well as Jack Daniels, Jim Beam, Absolut, Seagrams, Bacardi, etc. Why on earth would they limit the amount of strains you can buy at a time, or why would they only produce 1-3?

217 posted on 02/20/2002 11:47:58 AM PST by Nate505
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies]

Comment #218 Removed by Moderator

To: ThomasJefferson
Sorry to steal your thunder. That one was a classic. My ribs still ache from the rolling laughter.
219 posted on 02/20/2002 11:52:01 AM PST by AUgrad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 216 | View Replies]

To: ThomasJefferson
You think that with each post you get further and further away from answering #195, but it won't work.

LOL! Still embarassed about the self portrait you posted about yourself in reply #195.

220 posted on 02/20/2002 11:53:22 AM PST by Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 218 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 761-765 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson