Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Not Cold Fusion but: "Oak Ridge scientist exhausted, elated with response to research"
Knoxville News-Sentinel ^ | Mar 7, 2002 | Frank Munger, News-Sentinel senior writer

Posted on 03/07/2002 1:31:06 AM PST by The Raven

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last
They're downplaying it.
1 posted on 03/07/2002 1:31:06 AM PST by The Raven
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: The Raven
Cool. Maybe a neat new bubble fusion gun for the Special Ops boys in the future? Maybe I can program a plug in for Quake....
2 posted on 03/07/2002 1:40:38 AM PST by ovrtaxt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Raven
We shouldn't allow this type of research to be shared. It should be owned by the United States alone.
3 posted on 03/07/2002 1:41:04 AM PST by Naspino
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ovrtaxt
Here's the link the the referenced UK article that leaked
4 posted on 03/07/2002 1:43:49 AM PST by The Raven
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: The Raven
ORNL has impressive capabilities and is one of the most interesting places I have ever visited. Most of the national labs are filled with superb people. I'm glad they are on our side.
5 posted on 03/07/2002 1:50:33 AM PST by Movemout
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Raven
If they're getting bubbles "the size of a pencil top eraser" by irradiating with neutrons, why doesn't the agitation splash the acetone all over the place. Also why the wimpy shielding if they expect it to produce more neutrons (let alone the original neutrons)... paraffin blocks?!? It ought to be behind some thick lead.
6 posted on 03/07/2002 1:51:59 AM PST by HiTech RedNeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Raven
The celebrated work had not undergone peer review and when scientists around the globe failed to reproduce their results, the affair turned into one giant embarrassment for the Utah professors and science in general.

Horse manure.

"Science in general" came out smelling like a rose, because the debacle demonstrated that the scientific method, and scientists worldwide, "police their own" just fine. A paper based on faulty method was published, and the subsequent reproduction of the experiment (or more accurately, the lack thereof) and peer review tested it and properly found it wanting.

What actually earned the "giant embarrassment" was the *media*, which jumped to conclusions, shouted from the rooftops, and made a mountain out of this molehill before it had been properly examined, and certain glory-hound scientists who properly received their comeuppance for their preference for the spotlight over careful methodology.

7 posted on 03/07/2002 2:20:18 AM PST by Dan Day
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dan Day
because the debacle demonstrated that the scientific method, and scientists worldwide, "police their own" just fine

When it comes down to something that actually would MATTER in the everyday life of the average citizen, they might. The embarrassment at the prospect of looking like clowns to the public that worships them would motivate them to come clean. Unfortunately (flame bait warning) that doesn't seem to extend to the junk brought to bear for the Holy Dogma of Evolution... why, even if this Dogma were true, would we STILL have a curious silence from the scientific world about science textbooks that present long-discredited "evidences" for evolution. These scientists sure aren't silent when someone manages to get, say, intelligent design theory introduced into classrooms.

8 posted on 03/07/2002 2:32:52 AM PST by HiTech RedNeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Dan Day
The Media and other liberals hate it when the process works well,
and they will spin the story to push their agenda.

Remember Three Mile Island?
The Engineered safeguards worked properly, shut down the plant, without a leak into the environment.
The media and libs used this success as "proof" that nuclear power isn't safe.

9 posted on 03/07/2002 2:55:08 AM PST by ASA Vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: The Raven
Well, supposedly this occurs in acetone. Acetone is highly volatile. So how hot are they gonna be able to get that to fuel a heat exchanger? And what's the density of these reactions? Heating up a bunch of acetone a few degrees just won't cut it.
10 posted on 03/07/2002 2:55:45 AM PST by Justa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck
Because the container is closed, not open at the top. And because they need to stop neutrons not gamma rays.
11 posted on 03/07/2002 3:25:01 AM PST by Rifleman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Dan Day
Science in general has done poorly because the coverup of cold fusion was not exposed;
and some of those who sell their books about it continue that coverup up as they pose as "scientists".
12 posted on 03/07/2002 3:28:49 AM PST by Diogenesis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck
Typically, you use lead to stop Gamma Rays. Neutrons are better stopped by stuff like water, and paraffin.
13 posted on 03/07/2002 3:31:47 AM PST by FreeAtlanta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: FreeAtlanta
Actually, lead is only used for gamma rays up to about 200 keV.
From there to about 2 MeV, you can block with any material.
14 posted on 03/07/2002 4:01:09 AM PST by Diogenesis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Dan Day
The Utah scientists were afraid that one of the people they had asked to peer review their work was about to publish it as his discovery. Acting on this belief, they rushed to make sure they received credit for their own work.

There is a fascinating book on the subject, I believe it is titled 'Bad Science'.

15 posted on 03/07/2002 4:03:43 AM PST by Andrew Wiggin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck; Raven
"If they're getting bubbles "the size of a pencil top eraser" by irradiating with neutrons"They're using high energy density ultrasound to produce the cavitation(bubbles). The energy is high enough to produce ionization, but it's still mechanical energy and isn't anywhere near what it takes to enhance a fusion process. The neutron flux added, only serves to produce tritium and more deuterium. Even with this, the probability fusion will occur is still essentially nothing.

The 18 million degrees they mention, really only means some tiny fraction of ions of the light producing plasma are in an excited state, and some others, in the far tail of a velocity distribution, have large velocities. None of this could possibly lead to measurable fusion, because the probability of a deuterium/tritium nucleus having enough energy to overcome the electrostatic repulsion of another nucleus is astronomically small and the cross sections here are similar. All they do is heat the building in an expensive and elaborate way, all using power from the local TN power co.

16 posted on 03/07/2002 4:07:45 AM PST by spunkets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: The Raven
See the interesting, related cavitation research HERE (as well as a review of the field up through 1998). Go HERE for other papers on CANR (chemically assisted nuclear reactions).
17 posted on 03/07/2002 4:15:10 AM PST by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Naspino
We shouldn't allow this type of research to be shared. It should be owned by the United States alone.

I doubt that the tech could be kept. If they can figure out a way to harness such diffuse release, or to create the buble and collapse in a narrow stream, then this will be almost table-top with the right hardware.

I do not know that this is real, but that conditions in the center of collapsing bubbles are similar to that of the sun in terms of heat for a very brief time, has been known for some time. It's part of how bubbles pound propellers like a hammer, putting millions of tiny dents (craters) in the things.

18 posted on 03/07/2002 4:15:14 AM PST by lepton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: The Raven
a problem known as premature cavitation

They might want to see a specialist about that.

19 posted on 03/07/2002 4:17:04 AM PST by RogueIsland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Raven
"...a problem known as premature cavitation."

Ya gotta hate when that happens....

20 posted on 03/07/2002 4:18:40 AM PST by JMK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson