Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 03/12/2002 7:43:10 PM PST by Sawdring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Askel5, Flamefront, Rightwing2, soccer8
Squall
2 posted on 03/12/2002 7:46:24 PM PST by Sawdring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: *Miltech;*SuperWeapons;*Russia list;*China stuff;*Far east
Check the Bump List folders for articles related to and descriptions of the above topic(s) or for other topics of interest.
3 posted on 03/12/2002 7:49:16 PM PST by Free the USA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sawdring
The squall's downfall is that if you can "spoof" the targeting sensors on the attacking boat, then he has shot his wad, given away his position, and since the squall uses a hypercavitating shell - a nice clean path is cut in the water that can be seen from an aviation unit on the surface. Any submariner's care to comment?

Also, if China and France (!?) can buy a Squall - why can't the Republic of Texas? =)

4 posted on 03/12/2002 7:54:14 PM PST by PokeyJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sawdring
"The U.S. is China's hypothetical enemy, so Taiwan is not China's main target"

I hope that is true.  Otherwise, we will
stiff Taiwan and not prepare a Squall defense.

5 posted on 03/12/2002 7:55:38 PM PST by gcruse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sawdring
The concept of operations for this missile requires the crew of a submarine, ship or the coast guard define the target's parameters -- speed, distance and vector -- and feeds the data to the missile's automatic pilot. The missile is fired, achieves its optimum depth and switches on its engines. The missile does not have a homing warhead and follows a computer-generated program.

No wire-guidance, no homing capacity. Total reliance on "defining parameters".

I perceive a weakness--of course they claim the payload is a tactical nuke. Maybe.

At any rate, it certainly worked effectively to sink the Kursk--so we should be very afraid.

</ schadenfreude >

6 posted on 03/12/2002 8:14:34 PM PST by PhilDragoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sawdring
Squall torpedo, or VA-111 torpedo, were being tested on Russian nuclear submarine Kursk when it exploded and sank in Barents Sea on Aug. 12, 2000.

Although the cause of Kursk blast has not been defined, some Russian and Western military experts suspect the torpedo's volatile fuel liquid caused the explosion.


Heck, I say, let 'em have all they want.
7 posted on 03/12/2002 8:47:12 PM PST by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sawdring
Well, I've got a simple solution for the worried Tiawnese...go fork over some money and buy some yourselves...I'm sure if they put their wallets where their mouths are, instead of relying on other countries to protect them, they could have all these little toys.
8 posted on 03/13/2002 7:25:59 AM PST by Stavka2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cold war 2



10 posted on 03/21/2002 4:42:11 PM PST by Tailgunner Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson