Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: spectre
It doesn't seem to be classified anymore. You can get it from two-hundred different sources by now on the net so what does removing this post actually do? It keeps conservatives in the dark about important parts of the National defense debate. Although, if you keep up with the debate you could glean most of the conclusions this paper gives without actually reading the print.

Thanks for your concern, but this post does not merit removal.

7 posted on 03/23/2002 3:19:21 PM PST by Sawdring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: Sawdring
I appreciate your response. If it is not classified and is readily avaiable from "200 differnet sources" then by all means keep it on the forum.

Having said that, why post that it IS classified?

Look at michanger's headline which states in part

"(excerpts from the CLASSIFIED (my caps) Nuclear Posture Review)"

Note that he did not state FORMERLY classified.

Look at redwing2 response.

"I had not read the classified parts.." Not PREVIOUSLY classified parts.

Look at your response:

"...but this is the LEAKED document.."

Like I said, it is almost as if people are bragging about posting classified info.

If they know it is not classified and are attempting to paint it as such: Well then they are acting juvenile at best.

8 posted on 03/23/2002 3:50:29 PM PST by spectre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson