[Cold Heat]

The child porn angle has no legs that I can see. Out of the thousands of pics the guy gleefully allowed the authorities to view, there were but a few that resembled chid porn and only because they were designed to be so.(ie: probably phoney) That is why the charge is a secondary or even a non-event type of charge.(easilly defended)

I see nothing that convinces me that they even have the right guy. (except for the DNA) Even the DNA is as yet nailed down. I will wait till trial before I make any conclusions.

[Freedom2specul8]

I hate to even call the animated rape scenes as porn..They are obscene cartoons depicting an violent crime that is designed for an audience, that enjoys watching rape. Some of the audience may fantastize about rape..and the rape cartoons "could" provoke some into committing rape. That is a very strange and peculiar hobby.. and is definitely enough to make someone look at him twice. I am with you though, the so-called experts will have to look at the 100 questionable pics and rape scenes and draw a conclusion for us, the people. I hope and pray the so called experts are really qualified to make a judgement.

[Freedom2specul8]

If the defendant did not have the rape cartoons and other 66,900 pictures, (A VERY unusual amount..a tremendous amount) but only had 100 possible child porn pics, would you still think it's but a few?

[Freedom2specul8]

If the defendant did not have the rape cartoons and other 66,900 pictures, (A VERY unusual amount..a tremendous amount) but only had 100 possible child porn pics, would you still think it's but a few?

[Freedom2specul8]

I don't know if you're interested in lurknig/reading these threads..here's a bump..let me know and I'll ping ya next time too.