He lied about Anita Hill. Care to back that up? We are conservatives here. Therefore, we deal with facts, not baseless inuendo.
If you have some proof, we are all interested to hear it. But if all you have is "He lied because Peter Jennings said so," we will laugh you all the way back to DU.
There is never going to be any smoking gun. What I see is two people who had everything to lose by this story, and that Hill was in a position to lose more than Thomas. All Thomas had to do was deny what Hill said. Brock independently confirmed that it was Thomas who lied, because Brock could afford to lie the first time. I don't believe he lied about it the second time just to sell books.
BTW, I am a conservative. Just not one who is so obviously, what's that phrase, "Blinded..."