Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: USAF vet
You may not be a troll, but you have yet to establish any credibility. You blindly condemned Judge Thomas's actions on the Court, even though it is obvious you had never bothered to read any of his materials - just like a DU hack. Too bad you couldn't show Thomas the same consideration that you bragged you showed Ivins.

Most Freepers don't wildly regurgitate Democratic propaganda, and since you're doing all of this on your first day of registering, you raise a lot of red flags. In other words, we've seen guys like you before. I really do hope you are what you say you are, but past experience with first-day ranters suggests the opposite.

65 posted on 03/19/2002 7:20:27 PM PST by SpringheelJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]


To: Gary Aldrich
What does Gary Aldrich have to say about Brock's interviews and writings?
66 posted on 03/19/2002 7:25:38 PM PST by Fred Mertz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]

To: SpringheelJack
Interesting that USAF Vet (who joined FR today) defends self-admitted liar David Brock and castigates Judge Thomas about whom has has offered not one whit of SOLID evidence as proof to support his critique. Obviously this newbie (Immigrant from DU?) hasn't yet learned you need to have your FACTS straight on the FR before you start flaming away.
67 posted on 03/19/2002 7:26:06 PM PST by PJ-Comix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]

To: SpringheelJack
Most Freepers don't wildly regurgitate Democratic propaganda, and since you're doing all of this on your first day of registering, you raise a lot of red flags. In other words, we've seen guys like you before. I really do hope you are what you say you are, but past experience with first-day ranters suggests the opposite.

You have him nailed properly especially his comments about Thomas they are nothing but repeats as you say from the left wing press. If he is as well read as he states then he would have read the columns by conservatives that adequately refuted those statements about Thomas's work on the court
68 posted on 03/19/2002 7:28:15 PM PST by uncbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]

To: SpringheelJack
Ranting? I was attacked and fought back. You yourself accused me of being a troll. As you may have noticed, I don't believe in toeing the party line, just for the sake of toeing the party line. I said from the beginning that I'm not a fan of Thomas. You've moved me from that position, somewhat, but I still need to be convinced. But it's late here on the east coast, so I'll be leaving now. I appreciate your references though.
72 posted on 03/19/2002 7:46:03 PM PST by USAF vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]

To: SpringheelJack
Most Freepers don't wildly regurgitate Democratic propaganda, and since you're doing all of this on your first day of registering, you raise a lot of red flags.

And another red flag is that USAF vet never returned to the FR to post another comment after appearing on this thread on the SAME day that he registed last week. It sure looks like USAF Vet was either a troll or a seminar poster on orders to try to disrupt the FR.

93 posted on 03/24/2002 2:42:41 AM PST by PJ-Comix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson