Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
To: gopcapitalist; grlfrnd; HoustonCurmudgeon; antivenom; anymouse
For all of you with college age students, this sort of crap is what you're up against. But don't worry, it's only supported with part of your tuition money, not the entire amount. The other part is paid for with your tax money.
To: BUSHdude2000
Will the feminazis pile on Randy Woock for disrepecting duh sistuhs? I can't wait. Oh and he sounds like a 60s "flower child" hippy caught in a sexual revolution warp. Apparently he never heard of AIDS.
To: BUSHdude2000
I soooooo want to go back to college.
10 posted on
03/20/2002 1:02:30 AM PST by
Drango
"So let's cut the crap, people, and stop reviling those who don't suffer from the same sexual hang-ups as the rest of us." Fine. But you do know that nothing's free, right? If there is no emotional investment, there is no emotional return.
And the makers of Valtrex love you. This much.
12 posted on
03/20/2002 1:06:31 AM PST by
toenail
To: BUSHdude2000
THIS is what our colleges and universities are producing.
This moron claims we should venerate sluts, homewreckers, whores, easy women, etc. Notice I used the very terms this so-called student deplores. Why? Because they're accurate. Promiscuity spreads disease, discontentment, and divorce. It ruins lives, not just those of the perpetrators, but those of the wronged families, spouses and their children.
This clymer has the gall to pronounce morality "repressive". The "freedom" he is advocating is just warmed-over '60s pop psychology: "If it feels good, do it!"
No mention is made of others. This is ALL self-gratification. Do whatever you want, with no moral constraints; who cares if others get hurt, your happiness is paramount.
Dum-dum also mentions a "double standard". Sure, it's there. Doesn't make it right. And the very morality he despises CONDEMNS it as WRONG.
My conclusion is that this pathetic individual is unable to attract women, given his self-absorption, and wants to fool some into buying his pop psychology. "Hey baby, I won't make any demands on you!" Sure. Except when she gives him an STD, or sleeps with another guy, or when she mentions marriage, or gets pregnant (then watch him force her to have an abortion kill the baby.
Hey, this loser left his email addy. Go for it!
To: BUSHdude2000
While sex may not be the only thing on a guy's mind, it does go a long way towards making us more kindly disposed toward someone. I wonder how kind this guy would feel after catching something "not-so-kind". Oh, I forgot... one must use condoms. Colin Powell said so, so it must be true.
These schools are infested with morons.
To: BUSHdude2000
I sense the writer isn't getting any, and he's hoping that his 'post-feminist' rant will charm the sexually 'liberated' girls on his campus into his arms. Hee hee. Nice try, Woock.
To: BUSHdude2000
I wonder if "randy" Randy would marry a slut. How would he feel if his own mother "entertained" the college football team?
Sounds like a guy trying to suck up for more booty from the campus bimbos.
To: BUSHdude2000
Thank you, Bill.
20 posted on
03/20/2002 1:46:08 AM PST by
jos65
To: BUSHdude2000
All it does is make the woman who behaves properly and chaste more desirable to pursue for REAL relationships such as marraige.
The "college Sluts" can go through life embracing disasterous relationships and only further proving the consequences of such behavior are far worse than they were lead to believe by the left.
To: BUSHdude2000
Well at least he's in college and not on a farm. Ewe never know what he would be praising there.
22 posted on
03/20/2002 2:12:54 AM PST by
kaboom
To: BUSHdude2000
Woock, a senior psychology major, can be reached at nrrandy@hotmail.com. Figures.
To: BUSHdude2000
Gee, this young fella talks about "biological imperatives" without even giving a nod to a basic male biological imperative -- the male needs to ensure that a) any progeny produced are his and not some other male's (and no slut can give this guarrantee), and that b) said progeny reach breeding age. Methinks this young man doesn't understand that sexual relationships between men and women are far more complicated than just the sex itself -- and every bit of it is tied up in some sort of "biological imperative."
25 posted on
03/20/2002 2:29:47 AM PST by
Junior
To: BUSHdude2000
dumbass alert!!
sounds like this guy is suffering from venereal oxidation
(is that the right scientific term? a.k.a. 'rusty pecker')
Woock, a senior psychology major
but then, this says it all
he isnt even intelligent enough to get a real job
To: BUSHdude2000
Could also be a parody and he is enjoying himself by being rediculous. However, if he is or is not, the point that is made is that the sexual revolution was obviously invented by men, since they derive all the benefits and are freed from having to be gentlemen and doing the right thing. And women who buy into it have become objects and deserving of no respect. By so called freeing themselves sexually, they have made this even more a man's world.
To: BUSHdude2000
Tell me who brings more joy to more people: a girl in a monogamous relationship who would never dream of sleeping with someone that she didn't "love" or a woman who hops in bed with any person she finds sexually stimulating? The latter, of course.Can anyone guess the political persuasion of this author from the above quote?
These liberal scum want to ban a tremendous number of things "for the public good", like smoking, guns, fatty foods, etc, but are more than willing to praise ignorant sluts who willingly and wantonly expose themselves to crippling or deadly STDs. Must be nice (if confusing) to inhabit "double standard fantasyland".
To: BUSHdude2000
"Promiscuous women should be praised"and then they should be spanked, like the naughty girls they are :-)
not that there's anything wrong with that ...
33 posted on
03/20/2002 4:23:57 AM PST by
fnord
To: BUSHdude2000
Nice try, but I'll bet pimply Randy Woock still goes to bed alone this weekend. This sort of self-serving moral outrage plays better when the girls are drunk.
To: BUSHdude2000
The author highlights the common male hypocrisy. We see it more pronounced in Islamic cultures where women are forced to wear Burqas -- but it is fully in play in our own culture where male lusts are accepted and even praise, and where female lusts are disparaged in the most hateful terms. And the more hate you find, the closer you always seem to end up to some religious ideology. Funny that.
36 posted on
03/20/2002 5:13:09 AM PST by
jlogajan
To: one_particular_harbour
CountermoneychangerPing!
37 posted on
03/20/2002 6:24:04 AM PST by
hobbes1
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson