To: longshadow; PatrickHenry; Physicist; ThinkPlease; blam; Sabertooth; boris; VadeRetro; Stultis...
Ping :)
To: RadioAstronomer
Shoot!
I almost missed this thread.
To: RadioAstronomer
Thanks for the ping, sounds strange, but makes some sort of sense to scientists I suppose.
Infinity is best thought about in a nice warm bed, with the blanket pulled over your head....
18 posted on
03/20/2002 7:07:45 AM PST by
Aric2000
To: RadioAstronomer
So, if we're going to "boldly go where no man has gone before," we'd better go pretty fast?
To: RadioAstronomer
Honest question: How does this relate to the apparent ages of stars, then? If light from 10 billion light years away has the added component of this "faster than light expansion", doesn't that skew the age to younger than 10 billion years?
30 posted on
03/20/2002 7:17:22 AM PST by
HeadOn
To: RadioAstronomer
Thanks for the ping.
I'm reminded of the fellow who at the beginning of the last century claimed that all of the fundamental discoveries of science had been made and that the rest would be technical improvements and cataloguing the results.
32 posted on
03/20/2002 7:19:43 AM PST by
r9etb
To: RadioAstronomer
Thank you so much for the heads up!!! IMHO, until we arrive at a better determination of space topology it is too early to attribute the observation to speed faster than light:
A Small Spherical Universe after all? Cosmic crystallography looks at the 3-dimensional observed distribution of high redshift sources (e.g. galaxy clusters, quasars) in order to discover repeating patterns in their distribution, much like the repeating patterns of atoms observed in crystals. They showed that "pair separation histograms" are in most cases able to detect a multi- connected topology of space, in the form of spikes clearly standing out above the noise distribution as expected in the simply-connected case. The researchers have particularly studied small universe models, which explain the billions of visible galaxies are repeating images of a smaller number of actual galaxies.
To: RadioAstronomer
90 posted on
03/20/2002 8:41:28 AM PST by
blam
To: RadioAstronomer
Thanks for the ping. (why did you ping me? I'm not a scientist or anyhting like that)
Very interesting nonetheless. What is the energy source that is fueling the acceleration? Cosmic winds? And if we are to beleive Einstein wouldn't that energy source fail before light speed velocity is reached?
EBUCK
97 posted on
03/20/2002 9:00:32 AM PST by
EBUCK
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson