Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: week 71
I thought c was the upper limit in speed

RadioAstronomer will correct me if I'm wrong, but if you think of it like a balloon, it makes sense. C would be the max speed you could travel over the surface of the balloon, but it does not have anything to do with the rate of expansion of the balloon, which is what actually causes the galaxies on its surface to move apart.

16 posted on 03/20/2002 7:03:13 AM PST by RogueIsland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: RogueIsland
Good illustration in post 16. However I still think Einstein must be turning over in his grave if these new revelations are true. cheers
20 posted on 03/20/2002 7:09:46 AM PST by week 71
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: RogueIsland
C would be the max speed you could travel over the surface of the balloon, but it does not have anything to do with the rate of expansion of the balloon, which is what actually causes the galaxies on its surface to move apart.

You've got it.

The reason for this is that the speed of light limit applies to the movement of matter and transmittal of information; it does NOT apply to spacetime itself (as spacetime, the "fabric" of the Universe, has no mass and isn't "information.")

31 posted on 03/20/2002 7:19:20 AM PST by longshadow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson