Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Shooter 2.5
If they bought the assets of the company they can do anything they want...including getting out of any agreements to buy parts, pay wages, use the name or otherwise. A Justice Dept. agreement with the previous owner wouldn't necessarily be binding on the new owners. I think Safe T Hammer is talking out of both sides of their mouth.
18 posted on 03/21/2002 11:53:51 AM PST by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: Eric in the Ozarks
A Justice Dept. agreement with the previous owner wouldn't necessarily be binding on the new owners. I think Safe T Hammer is talking out of both sides of their mouth.

In this case, I'd be inclined to think that as long as the corporation is intact, so is the agreement. The "sale" to Saf-T-Hammer smells a corporate maneuver by Tompkins, as part of an effort to re-cast the company as "American owned". Nice try, fellas... but you can't polish a turd.

20 posted on 03/21/2002 1:58:29 PM PST by Charles Martel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson