Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 03/21/2002 8:01:14 PM PST by StopDemocratsDotCom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last
To: steve0113
ping - check your freepmail
122 posted on 03/22/2002 5:56:50 AM PST by nina0113
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: StopDemocratsDotCom
bump for later
123 posted on 03/22/2002 5:59:51 AM PST by eureka!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: StopDemocratsDotCom
Oh goody.

I'm sure the good Judge will do a bang-up job.
Same as...well; forget it.

Guess we're gonna get this CFR legislation after all.

125 posted on 03/22/2002 6:22:56 AM PST by Landru
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: StopDemocratsDotCom
I believe I heard some talking head on one of the cable news shows state that Bush had concerns about whether all parts of the bill were constitutional, but overall was good enough for him to sign the bill.

Is this ridiculous logic or what? Mark my words Bush not vetoing this bill will be a political mistake. The Supreme Court is going to slam the provisions down worse that the Fla. Supreme Court over the election. Mr. and Mrs. America may extract hide from some of the proponents of this bill when they realize the hoax these jerks were perpetuating. I hope McCain, Feingold et all are thrown out of office after the Supremes bitch slap them. I for one can hardly wait.

136 posted on 03/22/2002 7:29:25 AM PST by LaGrone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: StopDemocratsDotCom
If Ken Starr moves in this matter as fast as he did against Clinton we can expect this case to go before a court around the year 2051.
137 posted on 03/22/2002 7:30:46 AM PST by curmudgeonII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: StopDemocratsDotCom
The bill is H.R. 3256.

Correction: H.R.2356.

foreverfree

141 posted on 03/22/2002 8:00:43 AM PST by foreverfree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: StopDemocratsDotCom
Under the legislation, the most that an individual can contribute in hard money to a candidate per election would be $2,000, double the current ceiling.

I was just listening to Rush Limbaugh, and he said that there is an exception to that limit: if one's opponent is a rich guy financing his campaign with his own money, the hard money limit of the first candidate is raised to $6000.

I haven't read the legislation, but it seems to me that
if a candidate enlisted a rich dummy candidate (either in his party for the primary election or in one of the minor parties for the general election), then he could inflate his hard money contribution limit to $6000.

146 posted on 03/22/2002 9:20:23 AM PST by heleny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson