Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DoughtyOne
That DW was in a rage because he was spured by Brenda is IMO stretching it. The time frame prosecution gives is thin. There is too much resonable doubt. I wonder how much of the forensic evidence will come back inconclusive or there wasn't enough to test, then it will be emotion only. They will haul out all of the profilers that SD can buy. Like that's really a slam dunk.
7 posted on 03/24/2002 10:04:18 AM PST by Jaded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: Jaded
I believe the Van Dams had more to do with Westerfield than has been previously revealed. I think more will come out in the trial. Brenda's contention that she didn't know what an "adult party" was, leads me to think she's not being honest. And when it comes to Westerfield, I have a hard time accepting that he just wasn't her cup of tea. It sounds to me like she cast her sexual net over a large area, that would almost certainly include Westerfield.

Wasn't it revealed during the questioning of Brenda, that Westerfield was interested in hosting adult parties? Does that sound like a guy obsessed with children?

Westerfield is either a guy who deserves to die, or a man that is going to go down as one of the most unfairly slandered in recent history.

8 posted on 03/24/2002 10:23:23 AM PST by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson