Skip to comments.
Say the 'N' word, go to jail - Man sentenced for uttering slur at another for attacking his wife
WorldNetDaily ^
| February 20, 2002
| Diana Lynne
Posted on 03/26/2002 10:12:39 AM PST by occam's chainsaw
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-54 next last
This is a follow-up to a post I read back in October here at FR. The article is about a month old, but I could not find any posts of it in this forum.
To: occam's chainsaw
If this post survives until tomorrow, it will surprise me as others dealing this very subject have been removed by the moderator. (...not all "thought police" are liberal, you see, some indeed claim to be conservative).
2
posted on
03/26/2002 10:20:04 AM PST
by
meandog
To: occam's chainsaw
You have one of the best FR handles I've ever seen!
3
posted on
03/26/2002 10:21:05 AM PST
by
Xenalyte
To: Admin Moderator
"'Hate words' according to the Idaho legislature," Rae told WorldNetDaily, "are nigger, spook, gook, dike, fag, chink, spic there's not one of them in there relating to white people. There ain't 'cracker' or 'honkey.' So I say to myself, this is a law for minorities only, and that violates equal protection." Will FR ever list the words that can cause a post to be yanked?
(We'll include "redneck" I trust? =)
4
posted on
03/26/2002 10:23:07 AM PST
by
Askel5
To: occam's chainsaw
Bump for later
5
posted on
03/26/2002 10:23:18 AM PST
by
jboot
To: occam's chainsaw
Although I don't countenance the utterance of racial slurs, Idaho was my last hope for a sane retirement someday. Goodbye, cruel world..... ( 8~} )
6
posted on
03/26/2002 10:24:38 AM PST
by
tracer
To: occam's chainsaw
The "Equality Police" strike again.
7
posted on
03/26/2002 10:25:02 AM PST
by
aomagrat
To: occam's chainsaw
We were at McDonalds and a little black girl called my son "white boy", can we sue?
BTW we have black and white and native American ancestors, but only our European traits show, we only look caucasian.
8
posted on
03/26/2002 10:25:04 AM PST
by
buffyt
To: buffyt
Yah you can sue. Not only was a racial slur hurled at your child, but it was an incorrect slur at that. I think in Idaho you can sue for both. /sarcasm
In fairness, we never get to hear the ref's point of view on this. We only get to hear "our victims" story here.
EBUCK
9
posted on
03/26/2002 10:40:17 AM PST
by
EBUCK
To: occam's chainsaw; meandog
There's no reason this post should be removed... Good article. Especially Steele's remark about "Lonny Rae is being sacrificed on the altar of political correctness so that Idaho can be seen as the so-called Human Rights State and to counter recent negative publicity garnered from the McGuckin, Aryan Nations and Ruby Ridge affairs"...
This case is such obvious bullcrap. Manley was the one who incited retaliation in the first place.
10
posted on
03/26/2002 10:45:27 AM PST
by
maxwell
To: occam's chainsaw
"'Hate words' according to the Idaho legislature," Rae told WorldNetDaily, "are nigger, spook, gook, dike, fag, chink, spic When these words are used in song lyrics and/or movies, are the people uttering them going to be charged? Are the songs and movies going to be banned in Idaho?
Do we have two classes for first amendment rights, the artist and the subjects?
11
posted on
03/26/2002 10:47:05 AM PST
by
niki
Comment #12 Removed by Moderator
To: Askel5
Does this mean that I cannot refer to the spooks out of Langley? That one should not discuss the little Dutch boy who stuck his finger in the dike? Or that one cannot go upon private property and collect faggots of wood to burn in their fireplace? This seems to be something of a chink in our emotional armor. Must we use spic and span to cleanse every word of our everyday language? Truly, this is a niggardly approach. I am left without words.
Oh, by the way...want to see a group of faggots lying together on the ground? Take a look at this link!!
13
posted on
03/26/2002 10:55:31 AM PST
by
neutrino
Comment #14 Removed by Moderator
To: occam's chainsaw
Earlier this month, a jury acquitted Lonny Rae of felony "hate crime" but found him liable of assault for having hurled the epithet. City and county prosecutors refused to charge the black man with any crime. So you can physically grab somebody and hurt them, but you can't say certain words.
Nice, really nice. This country is really going down the tubes.
15
posted on
03/26/2002 11:00:07 AM PST
by
texlok
To: toddhisattva
That's rich.
Comment #17 Removed by Moderator
To: toddhisattva
I wonder if the judge has ever pondered what "Idaho" means in Ebonic.
18
posted on
03/26/2002 11:08:22 AM PST
by
meandog
To: neutrino
Oh, by the way...want to see a "stack of wood"
lying together on the ground? Take a look at this
19
posted on
03/26/2002 11:12:12 AM PST
by
meandog
Comment #20 Removed by Moderator
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-54 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson