Skip to comments.
4th-Graders Reprimanded For Lewd Acts in Classroom.
Austin American Statesman ^
| 3/26/02
| Janet Jacobs and Jonathan Osborne
Posted on 03/26/2002 10:53:21 AM PST by marshmallow
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120, 121-134 next last
To: goldstategop; FormerLib; Khepera; Brad's Gramma; EdReform;lentulusgracchus
LOL!!!! According to the accepted liberal definition, oral sex a la Clinton, isn't really sex at all. The 4th graders therefore committed no lewd act to have gotten them reprimanded in the first place. Shouldn't it have been time to move on? And any way, its a private matter. End of discussion. Umm
aside from the fact that ex-43 said sexual relations which is a term of art for coitus, Im not trying to defend him of course, you dont think the fourth graders should have been reprimanded and its a private matter?
Wow! I hope youre kids arent in the same class as mine, pre-pubescent 4th graders practicing perversion in the classroom seems like a no brainer for being intrinsically wrong, what are you advocating here? Either you have a drinking problem or you need to take another bong hit to get straight dude. Im not even sure the most liberal of Liberaltarians would believe such nonsense. Just when you think youve heard all the stupidity there is
To: marshmallow
One was probably an alter boy.
Just kidding!!!!!!
(Donning flame-proof asbestous suit)
To: Lunatic Fringe
Excellent work to find their website. I sent off 4 emails to the most likely administrators. What an outrage.
To: marshmallow
Seriously, NAMBLA must be grinding their teeth with jealousy. Gaol accomplished, just no gay men present.
To: marshmallow
I would really like to hear what the sex ed classes these future homos have been exposed to. What kind of "tollerance" have they been taught.
I'd like to ask the kid who started this, "Why?" And publish his answer everywhere.
I have the feeling that this is the canary in the mine. The first positive, un-ignorable warning of what has infiltrated our educational system.
To: All
As HORRID as this subject is, it's been a delight to read the whole thread and not find ONE bozo defending this. Thanks to all of you!!!!
To: aculeus
,,, the ball's in your court.
To: marshmallow
My understanding of the incident is that the ten year old on the recieving end is on parole (for who knows what) and he bullied two of the boys to preform on him while the other two held up jackets to hide the act.While the "Teacher" had her back to the class at her PC.
I heard the above from a spokesman for one of the boys on the Jeff Ward Show on Austin Talk Radio.sad.....
To: fourdeuce82d
What year was this?It would have been the early 70's -- and, yes, it was the Midwest. Believe it or not, you can live your teenaged life without knowing about every sexual manuever that exists.
To: MonroeDNA
To: marshmallow
I'm sure the Gay Alliance will love this. Can ever imagine this happening when you were a kid? Why wouldn't it now, think about it. Turn on Cable TV and you always see men having sex. It's not unusual. This is what the Gay movement wanted. They waited, they were patient and we let them put their foot in the door little by litte and now this is what we've sowed. No turning back.
111
posted on
03/26/2002 3:59:19 PM PST
by
Hildy
To: TADSLOS
Not a dare, an activity they repeated. I have no doubt that pro-homosexual curricula played a role in breaking down the walls between perversion and normalcy in the minds of these boys. MTV and other media did a lot toward normalizing public sexual activity too.
112
posted on
03/26/2002 4:03:54 PM PST
by
ethical
To: marshmallow
"Obviously, this is some kind of learned behavior, and it's our job to learn where it came from," Sooter said.
Learned!?
Why, you silly thing.... don't you KNOW that is a genetic thing, you wuz born this way, you can't change it, you MUST accept it.
(At least that's the MESSAGE on Network TV.)
113
posted on
03/26/2002 4:31:59 PM PST
by
Elsie
To: MonroeDNA
BUMP!!
To: fourdeuce82d
Yes seriously. That was the summer of 1981 and I was completely floored.
To: Bubba_Leroy
Look at the facial profile and hair of that statue. It actually appears to be a monument to Hillary!
To: Diddle E. Squat
Wonder if MF elementary will not set up a pink triangle room complete with bean bag chairs?
To: ethical
Bump
To: FreeperJr.
However, at least one mother, who asked not to be identified to protect her son's identity, said the acts were done under threat.
FreeperJr's reply:
He should have taken the beating instead. Would you say something like that to a rape victim? (And if he did do it under threat, it was tantamount to rape.)
119
posted on
03/26/2002 9:10:40 PM PST
by
murdoog
To: marshmallow
Homeschool time.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120, 121-134 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson