Explain how they will do that, please, sir. He signed a bill they BEGGED and THREATENED for; how can they turn that around and bash him with it?
My ubderstanding is that this bill would allolw the courts to find portions of the bill unconstitutional and allow other parts of the bill to stand. As opposed to the court striking down the entire bill.
Is this correct?
My guess is that Bush was working with McConnell to create a situation where the hard money limits are raised, where the unions & corps can appropriate members& shareholders money, but the limits on ads will be struck down. THis would inflict great harm on the rats. It would also hamstring congressional attampts to limit free speech by outside groups.
How hard do you think the Bush justice dept will defend the noxious portions of this bill in the courts?
Politics with the rats is a war and wars are dirty. We get our noses bent out of shape by the tatics employed, it will be instructive to see how this turns out. Bush is either a Machiavellian genius or a total corrupt fool.
I suspect he is not a total fool.